1. Home
  2. misc-audio
  3. 1288325648

Your feelings on vintage audio.

Harkening back to the days of my youth.....my neighbor owned a console with a Scott fm tuner, Fisher amp and a TT. I loved playing with and listening to music through it.

And with the resurgence of interest in older equipment in the market, its' impression of quality sound reproduction and build, perhaps nostalgic feelings and wanting to dabble in tubes on my part, I've gone ahead and purchased a Scott 350B tuner.

I'm also looking at another 350 and Scott intergrated.
I know they'll need some work. But for the price it seems like a fun way to step into tubes, satisfy this urge and you gotta admit some of that gear is absolutely stunning looking!

So...What do you guys and gals think? Worth the admission price plus repairs? Waste of time and cash? Could do better DIY or newer used equipment?

Sound Quality? From reading sounds like I might be getting mids but poor highs and poor bass!
Build Quality?

How does CD sound through the gear? Are there difficulties using CD with this older gear?

Maybe some speaker recommendations. Sat/Sub (problems with subs?), monitor, full range or single driver? The integrateds I'm looking at run anywhere from 15 to 30 watts RMS.

Thought this might be a fun pastime; I look forward to your input.

Best
corazon
mrtennis
3,295 posts
 
i think older tube gear, e.g., cj mv 125, and older digital hardware, such as cal tempest and aria, as well as older panel speakers, such as dayton wright, klh 9, quad 57, etc, are preferable to anything produced today.

what i am saying is that a stereo system configured during the 1960's can afford more musical enjoyment (including older turntable/arm/cartridge), than any stereo syetm configured from in production components.
corazon OP
209 posts
 
Mrtennis,

Would you care to elaborate? I, for one, am interested in your viewpoint.

Best,

Dave
t_bone
1,182 posts
 
Dave,
I think the answers to your original questions about vintage gear will be along the lines of 'it will sound good, provides excellent value for money, can be made even better with some updated parts, etc, but even then may not be the best that money can buy. But if you enjoy it, why not?'
My speakers are about 15yrs old. Everything else I am using is ~30yrs old. I like it. And value for money is great!
mrtennis
3,295 posts
 
my ideal system, back in 1967, was 2 pair of stacked quads, a mac c 22 preamp, 2 pair of quad 15/watt per channel mono blocks, a thorens td 124, with ortofon arm and cartridge.

i found that system so timbrally accurate that i have not heard anything available today, which approaches the sound i had in 1967.

i think the problem stems from the design criteria of current manufacturers which focus upon resolution but is lacking in listenability.

many of the products in production are fatiguing after long term listening.
ebm
5,165 posts
 
Its way cool.
More to discover