6chac:
1.Where one can not say, it is best to remain silent. That seems to have escaped your long response, all the while you claim that one can not say. That is delusiuonal, or if volitional, inauthentic.
2. There is a difference between claiming that you are encompassing the Truth in its entirety in words, versus using words to point at the Truth. Granted, pointing at the moon is not the moon, but Jesus and Buddha talked about the "what is" - or Zen, or God, or a higher level of organization, or whatever row you want to hoe - all the time, so I'll go with them, if you don't mind.
2. If someone claims they are enlightened, they usually aren't. I'm not, I know that.
3. I never heard the Buddha say that "I am right and you are wrong" with such judgemental force. Hmmm...
4. What does it mean when someone goes on and on decrying others going on and on?
5. If one has to look it up from someone else, or decry thinking and dialogue, itself part of the "what is", then he probably doesn't know.
Too far afield even for me. 6chac, if you want to continue, contact me directly and I will talk to you there.
1.Where one can not say, it is best to remain silent. That seems to have escaped your long response, all the while you claim that one can not say. That is delusiuonal, or if volitional, inauthentic.
2. There is a difference between claiming that you are encompassing the Truth in its entirety in words, versus using words to point at the Truth. Granted, pointing at the moon is not the moon, but Jesus and Buddha talked about the "what is" - or Zen, or God, or a higher level of organization, or whatever row you want to hoe - all the time, so I'll go with them, if you don't mind.
2. If someone claims they are enlightened, they usually aren't. I'm not, I know that.
3. I never heard the Buddha say that "I am right and you are wrong" with such judgemental force. Hmmm...
4. What does it mean when someone goes on and on decrying others going on and on?
5. If one has to look it up from someone else, or decry thinking and dialogue, itself part of the "what is", then he probably doesn't know.
Too far afield even for me. 6chac, if you want to continue, contact me directly and I will talk to you there.