Bryston BP-25 vs. Plinius CD-LAD


I am in search of a preamp with balanced outputs and these would be my two main candidates.
What I'm looking for is a pre which would add as much detail and "liveliness" as possible to a slightly warm and laid back system.
I haven't heard either one of them, though - so I'd like to hear some opinions/comparisons.

Thanks
aboldor
I use the BP25 as well, and agree with Jrd351, it's neutral, and exceptionally quiet, due to the outboard power supply, I guess. Like the fact that it sounds best plugged into the wall, and with the stock power cord. Also like the mono, mute and phase reverse features, all of which I find useful. Great pre,very listenable.

Mike
Thanks for the input. I'd really love to compare either of these pre-s with the one I have now. I'd like to know if they would bring a significant improvement. Plus, will a balanced connection make a big difference?
I use a Bryston BP25 and First Sound Deluxe II, which is a new addition. The Bryston is the more flexible of the two for reasons already mentioned above plus remote, balanced inputs/outputs, and a bypassable tape loop (which I found invaluable for adding an equalizer which could be bypassed when I desired a purer signal path). Of course, the warranty can't be beat, and I've had unbelievable service from Bryston when I needed to have an RCA input fixed. I had the pre back on the West coast from Ontario, Canada in five days round trip!
Hi, You can't go wrong with the Bryston either a BP20, or 25. I am useing one with a Bryston 4BST and it brought my electrostats to life.
We actually had a showdown here at my house with the CD-LAD vs the BP25.

The amp was the Spectron driving the Newform 645 ribbons. CD-source was the Levinson 390S. Cabling was JPS, and Empiricle Audio Silver (for comparison). Both preamps were run single-ended for fairness sake (this Plinius was only singel-ended).

The BP25 was first noticed as being quieter; the notes came out of a black background. The Bryston also had a more tuneful bass and low-midrange, the Plinius was rather dry.

The Plinius seemed to have more "air" on top, but over time it became apparent that it was a sort of HF "hash" or noise. Also we noted that when pushed hard, as in turning up the volume, the Plinius started sounding "strained" on the upper mid-range.

One listener (the owner...) at first thought that the Plinius had more detail and information on top, again it turned out that there was no more info, only the slight upward tilt and the (slight) hash.

It took a lot of back and forth to determine that the Bryston was actually presenting more real info, but its slightly dark nature vs the lighter sound of the Plinius had our ears fooled.