Rogue 88 vs 90

I never had a problem with the fan in my 88, I never hear it. It also has plenty of power for my speakers, but yes, the build is a little flimsy. The circuit board should have some more bracing so it does not flex so much when changing a tube. Otherwise it's not really an issue unless for some reason you need to move it around with the cover off.

My problem with the 88 is it's killed off 2 KT-88's within a year and I don't really play it that much. Mark tells me that the Stereo 90's tubes are ran at half the bias of the 88 which will make them last longer, and that's fine with me.

I'm just really wondering if anyone can tell me about the sound differences between the 2 models?

Why not spring for the 120's? I dought there is a huge diffrence between the 2. Boy is these a big diffrence between the 120's and the zeus. There is no " build " problem on this 200 lb amp.

ah yes Scottht trolling about rogue amps again
I don't trust Scottht's opinion.
Whenever he posts his poor review of Rogue, someone contradicts him, yet he moves to another forum and posts the same b.s. again
I read one where he moaned about quality issues, and then many people chimed and in said he doesn't know what he is talking about, so he moved to another forum and posted the same garbage again
tin eared Scottht - stop trolling and you won't pull out the anti troll in me

Really, you dug up a seven year old thread to bad mouth someone? Makes one wonder who the real troll is.