Tubes for a Conrad Johnson 17LS?

Jtimothya, thanks for the info. I take it to mean that best results would come from using the same tube type in positions 1&2 and 3&4 rather than 1&3 and 2&4, assuming you have only two tubes of the same type. My unit is a 17LS2. Dave

just a note of caution,be sure to use the shortest interconnect with this preamp as the output impedence is very high at 1000ohms,or the base will drop off quite a bit,also be sure your amp has at least an imput impedence of 20k,or you will be very unhappy.

mike,

I got a 17LS recently too. One important thing is that the stock Sovtek 6922 sucks big time. I borrowed my friend's 17LS2 stock tubes (Electro-Harmonix 6922) and they sounded so much better. Sovtek sounds too bright, harsh, and lifeless...

I eventually settled down with a quad of Amperex 6922 (White letter, USA) and I'm very pleased with them. Bass and treble performance are excellent and image is better than the EH.

My other components:
Amp: CJ11A
CDP: ARC CD1
Speakers: VA Beethoven + Sequerra T1 Tweeters

I would definetly recommend switching the stock tubes.
As Tvad posted earlier he let me borrow a set of Philips
miniwats and the difference they made was amazing.

The Philips were much quieter and had better bass
extension. The midrange was more defined and detailed.
The original Sovtek tubes sounded muddy and congested by
comparison. I would never go back to the stock tubes
on my 17LS.

Good luck
cmach

I really liked the Mullard CV2493 in my 17LS. But, I am only comparing it to the stock Sovtek 6922. In my area, availability of NOS tubes is somewhat limited. I found that the Mullard threw a much larger sound stage, particularly from front to back. I did not notice any difference side to side, but that may be room limitations. Also, compared to the Sovteks, the Mullard are a good bit airier.
Someone suggested this first - get really used to the sound of the Sovteks, to give yourself a reference point. Then, when you try different tubes, you can compare to the stock tubes.