Two systems? Why?


I mentioned on another thread that I have two completely different systems, one for HT and one for music. I wonder how many of y'all have taken that approach. Anyone care to comment on your systems and how they differ?

I'll start off.
My HT system: Paradigm Reference Studio 100 v2 mains, Reference CC, Reference ADP surrounds, and Servo 15 sub; Parasound 2500u pre/pro; Parasound 2205AT amp; Toshiba SD5700 DVD; Sony CX90ES CD jukebox; Monster cables.

My music system: JM Lab Mezzo Utopia speakers; Belles 350A amp; Rega Jupiter 2000 CD; various cables. No vinyl and no tubes (gasp).

Persons familiar with this gear will see clearly that I am seeking two quite different goals with these systems.

Others take a moment to share?
bishopwill
Tubegroover................
Like yourself, I love two channel. When I want to listen to music, I go to my two channel system. Fortunately, in my home, I have enough space so that I can have a dedicated music room set up quite nicely, and a dedicated theater room as well. I am not "wealthy", and so I designed and constructed these rooms myself. It wasn't tough, because this is how I make my living. Coming from a construction backround, it was affordable to do this in my humble home. It also helps to have friends and associates who owe you favors.
However, please realize that there are those of us who love film very much. A properly set up Home Theater system will draw you much more deeply into the experience of a film, and I am not pinpointing the audio aspect of such a set up, but the video reproduction as well. And this applies not only to film, but to sporting events and concerts as well.
There are those who are afraid of change who may make statements about the "Great Unwashed", that they lack imagination and that is why Home Theater attracts them so. I beg to differ! There are those who care about the renovaton of classics from "Citizen Kane" to "A Hard Day's Night". Also, I doubt that I am alone in my critisism of the botched "Godfather" trilogy. A travesty in too many aspects and not worth the price of admission. Of course, there are the great films that wouldn't be what they are today if not for the excellent soundtracks and photography that accompany them. Films such as "Contact", "The Sound Of Music", "Yellow Submarine", "Das Boot", "The Matrix" and a host of others too numerous to list here. Can anyone on this web-site tell me with a straight face that they prefer to watch these movies and listen to them through the crappy little speakers on their television instead of on a Home Theater system? And if you can, how can you call yourself an audiophile, or audio enthusiast? It makes no sense......................
What does make sense is asking yourself what MATTERS to YOU. If you are like me, then both matter and you want to enjoy them as best as your funds will allow.
Audio System:
Electrocompaniet AW250 DMB Power Amp
Electrocompaniet EC 4.7 Pre Amp
Electrocompaniet EMCP-1 Phono Stage
Wadia Model 8 Transport
Perpetual Technologies P1A/ P3A Dig. to Dig/ Dig. to Analog Convertors (With Modwright Upgrades)
Basis 1400 Turntable
Rega RB-300 Tone Arm
Benz Micro ACE Low output Moving Coil Cartridge
Talon Audio Peregrine Speakers
Talon Audio ROC Subwoofer
Stealth Audio Balanced/ Single Ended Interconnects and Speaker wire (Silver)
Richard Gray A/C Filtration

Home Theater:
Pioneer Elite PRO 620HD CRT Monitor
Pioneer Elite DV-37 DVD player
Mitsubishi HS-U776 VCR
Comcast High Definition Digital Cable Box
Anthem AVM-20 Pre/Pro
Monarchy SE-100 Deluxe Mono Blocks X 8
Monarchy Audio 24/96 Dip X 2
Paradigm Studio 100 Left/ Right Front speakers
Paradigm Studio CC Center Channel Speaker X 2
Paradigm SA-35 In Wall Left/ Right- Side and Rear Effect speakers
Sunfire Signature Architectural Subwoofers X 2
Tributaries Interconnects and Speaker wire through out
Tube-

I wouldn't call HT a breeze... getting the audio soundtracks right for HT is a breeze... that is definitely true... getting the video right...well...

Keep in mind that as much as we play around with our turntable setup and tubes, getting the best picture from your projector... well now you start talking about scalars, quadruplers, projector calibration, home theater computers, what color to paint your room, ambient light, what screen to use, it too becomes a never-ending battle for the perfect picture... and the prices of some video processors and projectors can be simply breathtaking... the cost to simply get into the game has a very high price tag associated with it.
you guys and gals are sick 3,4,5 systems. what are you junkies are what. what a minute i must have at least 4 operating systems. i must be sick as well,damn. oh well. i enjoy movies alot, but two channel is awsome. my two channel got most of the money but i am trying to upgrade my main theater right now. if you do not run a projector with at least 100 inches ht may not interest you guys. but once you see a good ht it is very enjoyable.hell i run tubes in my ht.
I agree with most of the comments above. Multiple systems offer far greater versatility along with the opportunity to stretch things out a bit. You can easily "flavour" different systems for different goals. With five different systems in my house, i have done just that. Why limit yourself to either tubes or ss, 2 ch or multi-channel, etc... when you can have ALL of them. While none of mine are "small" or "simple", it can be done and done quite tastefully. Just don't go overboard*. Sean
>

* AH - HAHAHA. Yeah, right...
Kirk,

We are all sick, why else would we be here? ;-) Judging from your gear you must be at *least* as bad as anyone who posted in this thread, (is CFB in here? he's pretty out of hand too it sounds like... ) LOL

Yeah, I dont' get too much crap for having 3 systems set up in my house (and I live alone), but damn I get a lot of crap for owning 5 cars! What's up with that? I could have bought all 5 of those cars (nothing newer than 1993) with the $ that's in just the biggest of the 2-channel systems... of course most people don't know that...

Bet that -930 refers to something with positive manifold pressure too...

-Ed