Open-Minded or Gullible?


Since recently joining this discussion group I have learned a few interesting things, reevaluated some of my opinions (biwireing), and marveled at a most astonishing collection of quasi-scientific mumbo jumbo. (Sorry about that).

Because I really would like to pick up some useful information, I need to have a feel for the degree of credibility to be given to comments made here. Should I really run out and spend $2000 on speaker cables because someone says they sound good?

I have suggested that we all have a limit to what we think might be true, or at least worth a try. Some, like me, are conservative: for example I believe that loudspeakers and phono pickups improve with initial use, but not wires. Others are more open-minded/gullible (you pick the word). I made an attempt to determine how "far out" the Audiogon opinion spectrum extends by asking a question that I thought would be near the limit.
"Do you think that reversing the direction of a cartridge fuse can affect sound quality?" Apparently not far enough!

8 of 17 people who responded to this question (some made other comments) think that reversing a fuse would (or could) make a difference.

What question should I ask next. Do granite shelves of equipment racks need breakin? I already know that some say yes. Does the air in the listening room need breakin? I don't dare ask. Instead why not have you guys tell me (us) where you draw the line, with a few examples near that line which you accept and reject.

Please no one take offense. I don't care what you choose to believe, and you ought to be proud to state your position.
eldartford
Some people might consider audiophilia to be the most anal hobby... actually they consider audiophiles to be the most anal... well... anal is no longer just a derogatory adjective in terms of all things audio. Thanks to Marco, we now know "anal-ing" is audio nirvana... or the last evolutionary step for us audiophiles is to become a kabob.
Thanks Viggen....what a nice thought....but I was thinking; I'd kinda like to be thought of as the one who put the "anal" in analogue!

Marco
Slappy, I must be showing my age. Some years ago a fellow by the name of Peter Belt in Great Britin claimed to have special charged little rubber belts that one placed around ones room to improve sound. Around the same time Tice marketed a little Radio Shack clock that had been specialy "treated" and if plugged into a common circuit would improve sound. Of course there are believers in exotic wood and stones too.
The "Tice" clock: you bought one for $600. amd PUT IT IN THE SAME ROOM AS YOUR SYSTEM.
Folks swore by them. (back in the late 1980's?)
(now we have $30 wall warts to clean up the A/C lines all over.
The 'belts" never heard of ceptin' Cd outer rings???
=================
My current favorite B.S. audiophile crap is "Shakti Stones" a glass? jar filled with special quasi-magical stones! they sit on your stuff and make it sound extra special.
but,
I personally can attest that breakin, wire and interconnect differences and some powercord differences exist.