thoughts on nordost thor?


I have been looking at ac treatment for my system. I actually had a bid accepted on a PS audio p500 (regenerated ac for source and the incorporated ultimate outlet for the rest) but the unit became faulty before shipping and so the deal was void. One of the audio magazines recently eluded to an upcoming review of the Nordost Thor and that it was something special; it would revolutionize. I have not seen any formal reviews to this date, though, so am curious as to what everyone might think. Particularly compared to the PS audio powerplants. I realize that the powerplants regenerate the ac, etc , which is different that the THor, but in terms of the end result, what do you think?
bigsam2
Dolphin, I would like to hear your thoughts on how these others compared to the Adept Response. If by some chance you had already done this in another post please post the link.
Jond, thanks I will check out that site. Dolphin, I had not heard of the adept response, but will research it a bit now. THanks.
Dolphin , exactly which of the Sound Applications conditioners are you refering to if you dont mind me asking as i have tried many conditioners and have found the Reference Line Stage by Sound Applications to have no peers so far .
Why is the Adept Response excellent? Compared to the other conditioners I mentioned, in my system, the Adept Response was more resolving without being clinical, more dynamic which resulted in better PRAT, and it portrayed a soundstage without peer. With 12 outlets, it can power the biggest systems and it is the ONLY conditioner I have ever heard that makes every amp I have plugged into it sound better.

Brainwater - I listened to/thru the LineStage.
Systems vary. I don't think the Adept Response is in the same league with the Sound Application Line Reference. But I don't think filter approaches the IsoClean. It is expensive, however.