As The_kid said "You have wrong speakers if you do NOT like "musicality"." [email protected] please clarify. Judy426 offered a great response to you question, if we understand it correctly, but you have to be kidding! right? Cheers!? |
Thank you for your replies: Musicality is just fine with me (otherwise id still kept my previous speakers). But i am afraid that a "warm" amp might render the system excessively "soft", thats why i was thinking of a "fast and detailed" amp rather than a musical one. My SFs give me all i want from that aspect (musicality) Sorry for the "clinical" bit, i meant it as an exageration to make my point clearer, but it obviously messed things up. -Mark02131 understood me though, and this is exactly my point. -Tomryan, thanks for the info, but for my budget i think an integrated would be a better solution. -Judy426, i've thought about the bryston, but id get sky-high on budget, provided that id need an equally good preamp to match, lets say a 3b-sst. the_kid: "Personally, I cannot think of anything that would sound "worse". I agree. Please check my first paragraph. |
I hesistate to suggest that certain amps would give you a more "clinical" sound with the SF Concerto because that would imply that the amps themselves are clinical sounding. But, if you are looking for speed and detail with SF speakers, I would expect Cary tube electronics to be among the least compatible electronics for getting that kind of sound. I personally like Naim electronics with SF (heard the Domus Concerto, the Cremona and the Homage Anniversario run on Naim systems and this was a great combination. They sounded too soft-edged and lacking in dynamics with otherwise great electronics that are less dynamic than the Naim gear (e.g., Hovland HP200/Radia). |
