best sounding small speakers


Which monitors have the best sound? Listening levels at no more than 100db. The mids and highs are the most important - but the lows are a definite bonus!
mattcone
There are hundreds of answers to this question. I'm sure you'll pull in a few. I like the sound of Silverline's SR17 monitors for their midtone purity. They reach pretty low for a speaker of their size.

You may want to include the rest of the system you'd be putting the speakers with, and the size of your room as well as some basic musical tastes, to narrow down the deluge of response you'll get. Also, search the archives...it's a pretty common subject.

Marco
The Green Mountain Callisto is an awesome speaker wich sounds right up your alley.
I have a pair of Sonus Faber Concerto Home stand mounted speakers. They are warm sounding, very easy on the ear and do a great dissappearing act. They also have the benefit of being reasonably priced.

They would not be well suited for high SPLs or rock music however.
Best monitor I've heard, by far, is the Intuitive Design Summit. Other monitors I've heard include Totem Tabu's, JM Labs Micro Utopia Be, and the Induction Dynamics S2 monitor (the S2 retailed at about $3000 the last time I checked). The Induction Dynamics Monitor is really special, and has a large, open, smooth and detailed sound. It uses a proprietary ("S4X Driver-Control Technology") fourth order crossover with inductively coupled drivers (their "brick wall" crossover, see footnote #1). I'm not sure, but they may be even better than the Totem Tabus. GREAT little speaker.

I'm fairly certain that the Summits are also the best speakerof ANY type--which I have personally heard--with the closest competitor being the Old, three box version of the Audio Physic Caldera being driven by about 7000 dollars of electronics, including Spectral products.(**See footnote #2). The Summits DEFINITELY sound better (at least overall) than any other floorstander I've heard, including Hales, Aerial 7 B's, Dunlavy SC IV's, Thiel CS 3-point..something, Totem Winds, Paradigm Studio 100 V 3's (which I owned for about a year or so), and Paradigm Signature S8's (which I auditioned in my house side by side against the 100 V 3's). There have also been some "dogs" which needn't be mentioned.

*FOOTNOTE #1: The approach taken by Induction Dynamics is essentially the opposite of a first order crossover, and may even be more stringent in terms of driver control than that of Jim Thiel, although I can't say for certain. On the Induction Dynamics website, they take great pride in pointing out their unusually steep crossover design.
{{Here's a quote: " S4X Driver-Control Technology delivers a virtually instantaneous roll-off after the crossover point, the quickest slope in the industry. This fast-acting "brickwall" crossover slope exceeds 30 dB/octave within one-half octave of the crossover frequency. Most crossovers range from 6 to 24 dB/octave and don't develop their maximum slope until the second octave."}}
All I know is that they sounded very, very good, and would appear to be a standout speaker in that class. Their soundstage did NOT seem constricted, and I say that knowing that the Summits and the Calderas both use a first order crossover (among other things, of course) to get their outstanding imaging.

**FOOTNOTE #2: It's close between the Calderas and the Summits, and it was a while ago, but I strongly suspect that the Summits would sound better in a direct A/B comparison based on my auditory memory. It's possible (but not likely) that I'd change my mind if an A/B was possible.