Watt Puppy 8 vs. Zu Definition

I heard both speakers at the audio show in LA earlier this month. It's really hard to compare them both, especially given the different rooms, electronics (Zu had much more modest source and preamp on hand relative to the Wilson room) and short listening session. I really liked both and am guessing the Zus are much better bang for the buck. However, I did find that the Zu Definitions did not provide a presence at the bottom-end to match the Wilsons. the Zus excelled well in other areas but didn't have the presence of the Wilsons.

I heard both too, and want to hear each again. I am going through the same decision making process. Honestly, if the 8s were still 23-24k list I would lean that way as I own and love Wilsons. However, they aren't, and 30k is a much different pricing point to me.

The Definitions have better low end I bet than displayed at the show as the couch was in a room node. I asked because 4 10"ers on the back seem like overkill if anything and was told that. i hope to hear a pair soon at 213Cobra's house to hear a real life scenario.

KeithR

The Definitions have better low end I bet than displayed at the show as the couch was in a room node. I asked because 4 10"ers on the back seem like overkill if anything and was told that. i hope to hear a pair soon at 213Cobra's house to hear a real life scenario.

You owe it to yourself to hear them at 213cobra's home, Keithr. There, they will sound vastly better than at the show. Along with other areas of improvement, you will indeed hear all of the bottom end that was completely missing at the hotel, where IMO the setting only hurt the company's efforts to demonstrate the strengths of the speaker.

As to the other half of the question posed, my wife and I were stunned by the coherency and dynamic impact of the Watt Puppy 8's, which was the first time (of many) that I've heard Wilsons and come away thinking I could happily own them.