The very concept of accuracy to the source is a fallacy that seems to haunt the hobby. Which is more accurate, an amp with .1% second harmonic distortion, or one with .05% fifth harmonic distortion? Is .1% IM distortion, because it is not musically related to the signal, worse than .1% THD? Which would be the more accurate speaker, the one with the flattest frequency response or the one with the lower distortion? And what if the test results change when the speakers are placed in different rooms? No, accuracy is the cloak of the insecure, those who crave external validation for their decisions. Tests are accurate, loudspeakers and listeners are all flawed. I really dislike the house sound of Thiels, but that does not invalidate your decision or the enrichment that you get from the musical place that they take you to.
- ...
- 47 posts total
- 47 posts total