Daedalus

Thanks for all the positive comments! There will be a review in Stereo Times in a couple of months on the DA-RMa.
In regards the offset tweeters, the Ulysses does NOT have offset tweeters, there are two but they both are flush with the baffle. On the DA-1.1& 2.1 the tweeters have an angle of about 10 degrees horizontal.

I have some notes on the site about the bottom half octave (below 28hz), and all my systems integrate very well with a sub because of the smooth roll-off in bass, though few people have found a sub necessary.

Anyhow I'm sure there will be more feedback on the DA-RMa as word gets out. I'm biased but I do think these are one of the best deals in audio.

Thanks much,
Lou

Hey Lou--are we going to see a review of the new DA-1.1 anytime soon?

I haven't found the right magazine/reviewer yet for the DA-1.1. Any suggestions?

You can find some input from Dan Wright (Modwright) on the Daedalus RMa speakers on this thread on AudioCircle.

Marco

Lou:

I don't really follow the different mags and online journals enough to know which would be most open to and best qualified to review your gear. I thought Bound For Sound did a very good job with the original DA-1. They also seem very old school in terms of advertising and the influence it may have on their product reviews. Six Moons seems to review gear that is "off the beaten path" and so may also be worth considering. You know much better than I about how the mag review process works. I'd just hate to see them reviewed in the context of a home theater system since the DA-1.1's really excel in a two-channel application. On another note, you raised the issue of using a sub with your designs. Not that I need one--the DA-1.1's have plenty of bass for me and my space--but perhaps you could discuss what type of sub you have used successfully with your designs in case people want to get that last bit of low frequency response that is not reproduced in your DA-1.1's or Ulysseys.