old revels vs new revels

hi, does any one have experience with the old vrs new revel sound, can you please say what the differences are in between them ? thanks , chrissain

chrissain03-07-2009 8:06pm

kr4 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 3,424 posts 03-07-2009 at 09:40pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I reviewed both in the same room. Here are the links: http://stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/302/ http://stereophile.com/floorloudspeakers/308revel/ FWIW. Kal
wpines Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 93 posts 03-07-2009 at 11:57pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete If your considering buying into something within the current Revel product line, give the F52 serious consideration.
chrissain OP Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 425 posts 03-08-2009 at 12:12am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete hi kal, I have read both of your reviews, but I did notice that you did not offer an opinion of which you liked better. are the new ones worth the extra money , or not? wpines, I have the revel f32s, and am thinking of the f52s, but maybe I should go for a pair of older gems instead, becouse I have a smaller room. any feedback would be welcome ! thanks , chrissain
kr4 Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 3,424 posts 03-08-2009 at 12:49am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete I definitely preferred the new ones in all ways except, as I wrote, for their more "ordinary" appearance. I have not heard the F52 for any useful time. Kal