I haven't heard the Ohm or the Druid.
I'm not sure which Martin Logan model you are referring to.
But generally speaking Martin Logan has magic and Gallo has Majesty. Both of these speakers will eliminate that boxy sound that you don't like.
The Martin Logan's sweet spot will be narrower, but if you mainly listen seated then this shouldn't be a problem. I have always loved Martin Logan, but they are not great Rock Speakers, but for Vocals and Acoustics they are fabulous. You do need to put them at least a few feet away from the back wall though.
Gallo is more dynamic, if you're worried about the bass output on the Gallo 3.1, then you should consider their Reference 3 SA Subwoofer Amp which would allow you to control the bass output better. This could be a future upgrade for you. If you want to fill the room with music, then Gallo is better for that.
I know you want to buy 2 and compare them, but I would buy one first and then if you're not sure, then I would by the other for comparison.
Good Luck!
I'm not sure which Martin Logan model you are referring to.
But generally speaking Martin Logan has magic and Gallo has Majesty. Both of these speakers will eliminate that boxy sound that you don't like.
The Martin Logan's sweet spot will be narrower, but if you mainly listen seated then this shouldn't be a problem. I have always loved Martin Logan, but they are not great Rock Speakers, but for Vocals and Acoustics they are fabulous. You do need to put them at least a few feet away from the back wall though.
Gallo is more dynamic, if you're worried about the bass output on the Gallo 3.1, then you should consider their Reference 3 SA Subwoofer Amp which would allow you to control the bass output better. This could be a future upgrade for you. If you want to fill the room with music, then Gallo is better for that.
I know you want to buy 2 and compare them, but I would buy one first and then if you're not sure, then I would by the other for comparison.
Good Luck!