Tried analog yet again after decades of digital


Ok Im posting this on the digital format because Id be handed my head if on the analog side.I like many over the years decided to try analog again.Ive hauled around records for years from place to place and never really wanted to part with them,more a memory thing I guess.To the point,I purchased a VPI scout recently,mounting a benz micro cartridge to it and various phone preamps I have inside such things as receivers and integrated amps along with a stand alone phono.Bought the record cleaner machine and all the stuff necessary to use the format properly,I think.Set the table up with time and patience and dialed it in as best I could without getting anal about it.What Im finding is a format that is really inferior to digital IMO.I say this forgetting the fact I wasn't expecting much as years ago I tried the same venture with disappointment of the out come.The constant snap ,crackle pop even on unplayed records,the hassle of having to get up every 15 minute to change the side,constant cleaning,setup of the table,all the bobbles needed to make it all go.I think to even come close to digital one must spend tons of money and tons of time.Im sure there are sytems that sound incredible,but at what expense and how much time devoted to it..Dont get me wrong its fun to play music that never made it to disc but anyone thinking alone these same lines as to recapturing what was once the only game in town,think long and hard.
missioncoonery
It's a strange thing, but...some of the WORST quality audio I've heard came from analog. And some of these were pretty pricey setups. One was at the house of an audio manufacturer whom I won't mention. Screechy and unmusical was the simplest way to describe it. You'd think he would know better.

Yet paradoxically, it is also true that the BEST quality audio I've heard...also came from analog. While digital is "constantly evolving" supposedly, I've heard audio extracted from 20+ year old turntables that the best digital I've heard still can't touch!

The only thing I get from this is maybe you DO need to be "anal" about your setup...because it seems this is very critical. But analog was never really about convenience, which was why digital came on strong in the first place.

If I were retired, I wouldn't mind devoting a lot of time to analog, to satisfy my audio OCD. Right now I just don't have enough time for it.
Cleaning and care is 'mandatory' for me to fully appreciate
the intimacy of sound on records. Missioncoonery - take a look at the "LAST Factory" record cleaning and preservative system. As all old timers will know a mold (mould for Brits) release compound has been used to allow the record to release from the metal 'stamper' used to actually press the record. LAST has a special cleaner for new records to remove any mold release residue. That done I play the record(my experience is one cleaning is usually enough) to confirm it plays cleanly. I then treat it with their LAST Preservative for even "enhanced" smoothness and dynamics. "Voila"! I just won't play any record,new or used, w/o cleaning it. Dust and oil is in the air-just ask any cleaning lady!
Ptss - do you use a cleaning machine?

If yes - which one?

I'm now going to start looking at these

Thanks for the "LAST" tips

Thanks

I see a lot of discussion here about the vinyl vs digital divide. My only comment is that almost every modern music recording since the mid-80's has been on a digital format. So if you buy vinyl from the modern era, it has likely gone through a A to D process then back again. In other words you aren't actual listening to a true analogue recording and are subject to the quality of that digital process before you ever put the stylus in the groove.

Vinyl for me is the fun of finding old classic recording (read: analogue) and enjoying them for what they are.