Tried analog yet again after decades of digital


Ok Im posting this on the digital format because Id be handed my head if on the analog side.I like many over the years decided to try analog again.Ive hauled around records for years from place to place and never really wanted to part with them,more a memory thing I guess.To the point,I purchased a VPI scout recently,mounting a benz micro cartridge to it and various phone preamps I have inside such things as receivers and integrated amps along with a stand alone phono.Bought the record cleaner machine and all the stuff necessary to use the format properly,I think.Set the table up with time and patience and dialed it in as best I could without getting anal about it.What Im finding is a format that is really inferior to digital IMO.I say this forgetting the fact I wasn't expecting much as years ago I tried the same venture with disappointment of the out come.The constant snap ,crackle pop even on unplayed records,the hassle of having to get up every 15 minute to change the side,constant cleaning,setup of the table,all the bobbles needed to make it all go.I think to even come close to digital one must spend tons of money and tons of time.Im sure there are sytems that sound incredible,but at what expense and how much time devoted to it..Dont get me wrong its fun to play music that never made it to disc but anyone thinking alone these same lines as to recapturing what was once the only game in town,think long and hard.
missioncoonery
I have tried other tables,had a Linn lp12 and thoughts it sucked.I did all the upgrades whithout spending what I considered a big waste of my money and time.Had a Linn guru do his magic in the setup and sold it re-cooping my money.Tried a Rega table as well.The bottom line for me is im done with taking this any further.My TT setup is good but I just don't think its on par with my digital side and never will be... I listen to my albums and yes I enjoy it but when I really want to get serious im on the digital setup.
Fair enough man :)  sounds like you gave it a good go.  On the upside, it's always nice when you can focus on where you want to go, and I look forward to hearing about that.
A good recording is a good recording regardless of medium. All starts with source.
At 77, I'm older than  most here. I started collecting records in Jr. High School when 78's were fifty-cents apiece.

 I bought one of the first CD players when CD first hit the scene. It was one of those Phillips top loaders. I thought it sounded like crappola.

 Over the years, I've upgraded the CD system and now run an ARC CD-7se. Okay ... now most CDs sound really good ... some sound really, REALLY good. BUT for critical listening, and to get really emotionally involved in the music, I still think vinyl is the way to go.

To my ears, there's  nothing like an early stereo or mono recording recorded back in the days when all tube electronics (including the mikes), were used. Everything from massed strings to vocals, with the right analog setup, can sound absolutely fantastic. If you're not getting these results from your records ... just stay on the upgrade path 'til ya gets it right. 
Sorry for the off topic reply, but Oregonpapa look into the the way the Tacet label records for classical.