Has anyone heard the new North American products preamp and amp?

geoffkait,
Roger wrote,

"The most startling aspect of the analog "jitter" is how bad it is compared to other destructive forces caused by the physical world. The unstable velocity in the amplifier happens at nano-scopic levels (far below measurable levels). But again - knowing it is there and making attempts to catch it happening based on [theory] is no different than you placing lead weights on boxes and draping your cables over insulators knowing that you are blindly affecting the issue."

geoffkait wrote,

pretty sure that entire paragraph is another one of those false arguments, you know....a Strawman argument.  What is illogical about it?  Well, for starters, we have the capability to measure things that are nano scale.

Ok - so if we already have the capability to measure things that are nano scale and you are assuming it can be applied to sound reproduction - why haven't we done it already? Has the audio industry been wasting its time when all they had to do is use the magic tools we already have?

Because we are talking apples and oranges.  Reed Solomon does absolutely nothing in the analog world. It only deals with on/off. I was afraid to use the term "jitter" when describing my work but I thought it might trigger some kinship to the concept of tiny amounts of interference or disturbance. This is why I prefaced it with the term "analog". I realize it is probably an oxymoron since jitter is deviation or displacement of a pulse in a digital signal. It may only have added some confusion to the correction process I use which is 100% analog and also lives in the nano scale.

Roger

Hey Roger,

I am very fascinated by the discussion so far and is in agreement with the consensus that proof of the claim is in the listening. Is it fair to speculate that this technology could soon be available as a separate device to be placed before the speaker providing much of the same effect?

hew,

You are right the proof is in the pudding. As far as a separate device - as you know a chain is only as strong as its weakest link. I have had great success at the power amp end of the chain mostly because the power amp has a tricky task to perform correctly. That is driving the final transducer that converts the electrical language into mechanical language that ultimately allows the sonic continuum to make its way to your ear-brain system. However, every part of the chain should be of the same caliber.

The Wavefront Timing Control I developed on earlier models of the preamp was a way to manually decode or filter a fixed disturbance in the chain. It required making a separate adjustment every time you switched sources or even between different recording labels. The current auto-focus system is much more sophisticated in that it can detect the velocity that comes embedded within the audio signal. For this reason I use auto-focus in the preamp as well. The DAC and the phono stage also has auto-focus because it handles issues that pertain to the specific stage in question. It cannot guarantee fixing anything upstream. (A bad front end will still sound bad).

There are many recording studios waiting now for this process to be available as a mic preamp which is already under way. I hope to have recordings done this way later this year.

Roger

Oh Brother!!
Off topic rants cause me to glaze over.
Then I skip them and look for real information.
Thank you Roger, and all who have shared pertinent info.

"Never argue with a fool, onlookers might not be able to tell the difference" Poor Richard

"Oh Brother!!
Off topic rants cause me to glaze over.
Then I skip them and look for real information.
Thank you Roger, and all who have shared pertinent info.

"Never argue with a fool, onlookers might not be able to tell the difference" Poor Richard"

The only one I see ranting here is you. I suppose every organ grinder has to have a monkey.