"I’ve professionally mixed, recorded, and performed electric and acoustic
music for decades, and if anybody thinks acoustic instruments are less
dynamic than electric ones, they’re unaware of the of the basics of
music sound and reproduction. And that’s OK…comments like "over cook the
solo" demonstrate a sincere but utterly naive perception of sound not
actually existing in reality. Steve is almost charming in his somewhat
innocent weird little world, and Atmasphere is 100% correct."
Dynamic? Each acoustic instrument has a dynamic range. Yes some will get rather loud. Thinking of a Steinway grand piano. I've been around live music and musicians myself. Studied and performed. Then got a day job. but I know the sounds of instruments.... particularly acoustic ones.
But still, amplified rock and roll takes 'loud' to another level. Amplified electric guitar vs acoustic guitar. The electric guitar produces a less complex mixture of tones and texture than does the acoustic guitar which has a sound box made of selected woods, rather thin and carefully seasoned, that affects the plucked string with woody under and overtones. there is a complex texture of all the vibrating elements within. Even the very air that carries the sound.
Some phono cartridges will describe the texture and tones of an acoustic instrument better than others. But will the same cartridge that so deliciously described the wood inside the soundbox of that Martin guitar also lend itself toward getting that over-cooked Jimmy Page electric guitar solo rendered so that the listener perceives its reality?
Well, maybe the recording engineer is responsible for that slightly 'over-cooked' guitar solo because it was mic'd a tad hot and he chose not to use as much compression as do the other engineers in the trade.
Will that same cartridge deliver the muscular thrust, intensity and speed of the rock performance as it did reproducing a string quartet? I'm saying there is always a compromise. And different cartridges have their own sets of strengths and weakness'. The cartridge designer, when he voices his particular cartridge, will favor one genre of music over another. Some have, anyway. Where is the sweet spot in your low output moving coil cartridge? They all have one.
Amplified rock and roll. It can have its subtleties, but mainly it works best when you've pressurized the room. The energy of the reproduction should deliver a compulsion to the listener that will cause him/her to involuntarily move feet, tap toes, bob head and generally be body and soul immersed into the groove of it. Some turntables will deliver this compulsion better than others. All you have to do is hear this to know it. And you evidently have not heard this. Though you think you do.
Will that same turntable that rocked out so nicely get the subtleties of the acoustic mix in that string quartet?.... Only your ears will tell you this much.
I get the impression you guys are listening with your intellects rather than your heart. If you believe a thing from the outset, your mind will allow you to process all sensory input you receive in a manner that supports your preconceived notions. This even extends to recording engineers. And especially opinionated ones.
-Steve
Dynamic? Each acoustic instrument has a dynamic range. Yes some will get rather loud. Thinking of a Steinway grand piano. I've been around live music and musicians myself. Studied and performed. Then got a day job. but I know the sounds of instruments.... particularly acoustic ones.
But still, amplified rock and roll takes 'loud' to another level. Amplified electric guitar vs acoustic guitar. The electric guitar produces a less complex mixture of tones and texture than does the acoustic guitar which has a sound box made of selected woods, rather thin and carefully seasoned, that affects the plucked string with woody under and overtones. there is a complex texture of all the vibrating elements within. Even the very air that carries the sound.
Some phono cartridges will describe the texture and tones of an acoustic instrument better than others. But will the same cartridge that so deliciously described the wood inside the soundbox of that Martin guitar also lend itself toward getting that over-cooked Jimmy Page electric guitar solo rendered so that the listener perceives its reality?
Well, maybe the recording engineer is responsible for that slightly 'over-cooked' guitar solo because it was mic'd a tad hot and he chose not to use as much compression as do the other engineers in the trade.
Will that same cartridge deliver the muscular thrust, intensity and speed of the rock performance as it did reproducing a string quartet? I'm saying there is always a compromise. And different cartridges have their own sets of strengths and weakness'. The cartridge designer, when he voices his particular cartridge, will favor one genre of music over another. Some have, anyway. Where is the sweet spot in your low output moving coil cartridge? They all have one.
Amplified rock and roll. It can have its subtleties, but mainly it works best when you've pressurized the room. The energy of the reproduction should deliver a compulsion to the listener that will cause him/her to involuntarily move feet, tap toes, bob head and generally be body and soul immersed into the groove of it. Some turntables will deliver this compulsion better than others. All you have to do is hear this to know it. And you evidently have not heard this. Though you think you do.
Will that same turntable that rocked out so nicely get the subtleties of the acoustic mix in that string quartet?.... Only your ears will tell you this much.
I get the impression you guys are listening with your intellects rather than your heart. If you believe a thing from the outset, your mind will allow you to process all sensory input you receive in a manner that supports your preconceived notions. This even extends to recording engineers. And especially opinionated ones.
-Steve

