Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?


Mechanical grounding or isolation from vibration has been a hot topic as of late.  Many know from experience that footers, stands and other vibration technologies impact things that vibrate a lot like speakers, subs or even listening rooms (my recent experience with an "Energy room").  The question is does it have merit when it comes to electronics and if so why?  Are there plausible explanations for their effect on electronics or suggested measurement paradigms to document such an effect?
agear
For those interested I have quite a few technical papers on my web site.

See this page for the links to technical papers, including vibration isolation, the Clever Little Clock and even the Teleportation Tweak,

http://www.machinadynamica.com/machina6.htm
I presume you are using the word "technical" loosely here.  In regards to the Teleportation Tweak you state:

4. What does the Teleportation Tweak sound like? By attenuating the deleterious effects of the particular Information Field associated with the cell phone or land line phone the sound in the room becomes much closer to the sound that you would hear in an ideal world, I.e., a world without such subconscious interference that reduces the listener's sensory perception. After the Teleportation Tweak is performed the listener can more easily hear the complete and undistorted sound that his system is FULLY CAPABLE OF PRODUCING, that the system was producing BEFORE the TT. In other words, the SOUND WAS IN THE ROOM THE WHOLE TIME, he just couldn't fully appreciate the sound quality since his hearing ability had always been in a degraded state and not up to the level he always assumed it was.

So maybe Michael and Bobby shared a few peace pipes.  It appears as if you were an early disciple and test subject of Timothy Leary based on your somewhat schizoid mentation.  Maybe I am dim, but I do not understand the paragraph referenced above.  Time to call in the experts for an explanation.  ;)....

Geoff

I thought you knew that the refractive polarity angle steered away from the component was determined by the shear velocity of the material. Tom
theaudiotweak
1,385 posts
10-21-2016 9:24pm
Geoff

I thought you knew that the refractive polarity angle steered away from the component was determined by the shear velocity of the material. Tom

There you go with those big words, again. But I’m afraid this is simply another case of your making a wrong assumption. As fate would have it I was not using diamonds under a component. One imagine when the points of cones like audio points are pointed up the seismic shear forces are directed into the component more easily, eh?

I really enjoy this thread , among others with Geoff and Tom  . I actually look forward to checking them . : ) what i would enjoy seeing is your system Geoff . How come i can't  find a listing or pics anywhere or in virtual systems . I have read you are using a modded discman ?
Can you elaborate on your setup ..please without a cryptic comment ? i'm sure many are interested in your setup. How often does a teleportation tweek need to be reset or recharged ? 
Thanks 😬
 

Robert, the drum suspension system I referred to is called R.I.M.S., the letters standing for Resonance Isolation Mounting System. An L.A. studio drummer named Gauger invented and introduced them in 1980, and licensed the manufacturing rights first to DW (Drum Workshop), one of the most progressive drum companies around. R.I.M.S. revolutionized drum mounts, almost every company now using them or making their own version of the same principle. R.I.M.S. attach to the drumhead tensioning hoop rather than the drum shell, allowing the shell to freely vibrate, increasing it’s sustain (the length of time the shell "rings") considerably. A mount attached to the shell itself "chokes" the sound of the drum.

The term resonance in reference to a drum shell is in regards to the length of time it "rings", it’s sustain. But the nature of the construction of the shell also affects it’s resonance; thinner shells usually resonate longer and at a lower pitch than do thicker ones, the extra wood of thicker shells raising the shell’s resonant frequency (it’s "fundamental") and acting as a form of self-damping. The timbre of that resonance is a different matter, timbre being what civilians ;-) call "tone". Timbre is determined by the relative strength of the harmonics of the fundamental. Drums are not considered a "tuned" instrument (an exception being the tympani and Caribbean steel drums), the way guitar and bass are. That’s because drums produce so many overtones (not just harmonics, but intermediate notes) having as much strength as the fundamental itself, that the fundamental is hard to distinguish.

Drums used for recording often have damping applied to the heads, to change the sound of the drum towards the "tighter" sound you mentioned. Tighter in, ironically, having less ring, but in this case of the higher overtones only. The damping absorbs only the highest overtones, making the fundamental more audible. I saw studio drummer Jim Keltner (Traveling Wilbury’s, Ry Cooder, George Harrison, Randy Newman, hundreds of others) playing live on a sound stage in Burbank, and his DW’s rang so long the drum sound was a real mess---far too much sustain for my liking. The struck notes were not audible individually, each still resonating loudly as the next was played---one big, rumbly mess. The opposite of that is the sound Levon Helm of The Band is known for---"thumpy". Gene Krupa’s drums also sound thumpy on those recordings from the 1940’s, but that’s because plastic drum heads had not been invented yet. Plastic heads weren’t available until the late 50’s, and they rapidly replaced the calfskin used until then. Calf heads don’t need damping, as they already sound dead (pun intended ;-).