Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?

agear OP
1,181 posts
10-24-2016 4:03pm
Randy: "agear - It is not even theory, in the scientific definition of theory.

It is just woo-woo, and utterly worthless."

To which agear replied,

"It IS fun to watch him try to duck and jive now though.
Agreed. The jokes and ad hominem are less impactful when your underwear is around your ankles....."

Look at it this way. At least someone in your family got an education. You’re left with a high school sense of humor. Your daddy must be very proud.

Geoff, your theories, while entertaining, are not helping the thread at this point.  Try starting another thread along those lines if you wish.  

Agear, they are not even theories, they are hypotheses. In other words, a guess. The reason you never see any supporting evidence or documentation for his products is because there is none. No scientist has bought any of them and said "Wow, this is going to change the world!" or "This thing really works." I am not talking six moons or any end users. I mean real scientists that can peer review something like this. That would be how real scientific discoveries are validated. Geoff would never allow that to happen because the fraud would be exposed.

agear OP
1,182 posts
10-24-2016 6:26pm
Geoff, your theories, while entertaining, are not helping the thread at this point. Try starting another thread along those lines if you wish.

If you recall you were the one who demanded I discuss Morphic resonance. In fact you insinuated I was dodging your questions. You can’t have it both ways, silly. OK, you can proceed with your troll thread.

csmgolf
297 posts
10-24-2016 6:51pm
Agear, they are not even theories, they are hypotheses. In other words, a guess. The reason you never see any supporting evidence or documentation for his products is because there is none. No scientist has bought any of them and said "Wow, this is going to change the world!" or "This thing really works." I am not talking six moons or any end users. I mean real scientists that can peer review something like this. That would be how real scientific discoveries are validated. Geoff would never allow that to happen because the fraud would be exposed.

Whoa! What? That’s got to be the dumbest thing I heard all day. Somebody was sleeping the day they taught that an hypothesis IS a theory.  Duh! I propose the Laughing Goat award go to camgolf.