Recording Studio sound Vs. Audiophile system


Has anyone had the opportunity to compare what they hear in a recording studio vs. What they hear in their own system?

i recently had a friend come over and Listen to the album they had just recorded and mixed with a fantastic NYC engineer. The drums were recorded analog in a large studio (the way top albums are) while the rest was recorded digitally.

I was was quite impressed with the sound as the engineer captured the full envelope and dynamic shadings (for a rock record, that is). In fact the engineer doesn’t even allow people to take pictures of his mic positions or Pro tools session settings- I can hear why he’s protective of his secret sauce.


I pushed her for a comparison of what she heard in the studio vs. What she was hearing in my system. She commented that she could hear much more in my system vs. The studio, and would have mixed the vocals diferrently!

I cautioned her to make sure the mastering she was planning on having done doesn’t squash the life out of the tracks, or introduce subtle distortion in an attempt to win the "loudness wars."

I’m getting ready to do a blumlein Stereo recording for another friend in my space and Tonight I played some tracks the Rupert Neve company uploaded comparing seperate guitar and vocal tracks with 2 difference mic pre amps, so perspective buyers can compare. (One I own and one is a newer design/flavor)

https://m.soundcloud.com/rupertnevedesigns/sets/shelford-channel-and-portico-ii-channel-comparison

In an interview The engineer that recorded the demo tracks seemed to prefer the newer preamp over the one I own, as he felt it emulated some of the Classic Neve units and had a bigger sound.

Upon listening to the naked tracks in my system ( Tad cr1’s + PS Audio/Atmasphere electronics and top power conditioning) it was so obvious the newer (retro) design was glossing over the details the older more transparent Portico II design easily revealed.

In fact I could hear lots of flaws in the recording, eq, breath pops, ) with the more transparent pre amp.

My point is that often listening to recordings on my system I think " if only the engineer / producer could hear their work on a system of this level (and in a big room) their aesthetic and technical choices would provide much better recordings.

I often hear to me what sounds like mic pre amp subtly distorting or hitting their dynamic threshold (gain set too high or low) , which makes the sound brittle or hard.

Anyone else with studio vs. Audiophile experience who can chime in?

I know hearing a multi track master can be an incredible and dynamic experience but I’m referring more to the final mixes.
emailists
Steakster. Interesting analogy to color grading. Is that your full time gig?

I have a Davinci Resolve color suite (including the big advanced panels -picture attached below) and as you know, what happens on the consumer end with TV’s set to Torch Mode, the product watched on computer displays and tables/phones is a nightmare.

Incidentally I shy away from LUT’s when possible as clipping can occur and prefer to use Davinci’s own color management or my own grade to pull log footage into rec 709 space.

http://edit-video.com/resolve_suite.JPG
I guess one can say there are sound engineers and then there are sound engineers.
Emailists. Very nice set-up. Looks like you have all the bells & whistles. Your room is where the magic happens. Postproduction rocks! I was a D.P. Started in NYC/Washington, DC - last 20 years or so in L.A. I’ve spent countless hours in telecine suites with DaVinci controls. Always enjoyed the company of colorists – especially, the really good ones. :-) My early mentor, Fritz Roland of Roland House in D.C, was one of the first to push DaVinci into building a console for Betacam - in its formative years of component color – somewhere around 1980. Fritz was a mover and shaker. Miss him! I’m not shooting any more. Now, teaching it at a university. Some of my active D.P. friends are testing BT2020. The digital frontier is like the wild west.