Thanks, toddveronne. The title of this post included general isolation, so why I threw my rack into the mix.
The wall is a bearing wall that sits on the foundation wall, so it's not wiggly! The rack can only rock forwards and backwards, so much more stable side-to-side. If I stomp/jump in front of it, I can get the stylus to skip. Otherwise, not a problem, so it's a safety issue.
The 1x2" pieces will be rigid if I directly tie them into the 2x4" rail across the wall. Another A-gon member recommended this over dampening material in-between, but my dealer suggested the dampening. The positioning of the 2x4" changes if I use/don't use the dampening, so I'm trying to avoid a re-do. When playing music, if I put my hand on the wall, I can feel the vibrations, so do I want the vibrations transferring to my rack or not is the question? It seems, that a small consensus so far supports the direct approach, and to solve vibration issues by isolating the components, instead.
Kenny
The wall is a bearing wall that sits on the foundation wall, so it's not wiggly! The rack can only rock forwards and backwards, so much more stable side-to-side. If I stomp/jump in front of it, I can get the stylus to skip. Otherwise, not a problem, so it's a safety issue.
The 1x2" pieces will be rigid if I directly tie them into the 2x4" rail across the wall. Another A-gon member recommended this over dampening material in-between, but my dealer suggested the dampening. The positioning of the 2x4" changes if I use/don't use the dampening, so I'm trying to avoid a re-do. When playing music, if I put my hand on the wall, I can feel the vibrations, so do I want the vibrations transferring to my rack or not is the question? It seems, that a small consensus so far supports the direct approach, and to solve vibration issues by isolating the components, instead.
Kenny

