Are extended warranties necessary on plasmas?


I was considering purchasing a 42 inch plasma last week for around $2000. The salesman strongly recommeded the extended warranty, at a cost of $500. I backed off because something seemed very wrong with a 25% markup for a warranty. The unit came with a 90 day warranty for labor and 1 year for parts. Has anyone had or seen any lemons that tanked out before the manufacturers warranty expired? Has anyone ever have a plasma repaired? If so, what was the cost?
128x128mitch4t
Pescolar, $500 is something. It's $500. They make you pay all $500 of it up front....not .27 cents a day over 5 yrs.

A 25% warranty is excessive.
Heres my 2...

1. Use a credit card that doubles the manufacturers warranty. The base warranty on decent plasmas really should be one and one, not 90 days and one.

2. Bad Pixels on Plasmas are usually bad from the git go' pixels almost never go bad during the life of a plasma; its an upfront QA issue with plasmas.

3. To address the post with all the plasma failures up there- I Believe it. All the way. All of those brands, especially and including NEC, have failure rates above Panasonic, Fujitsu, and Hitachi. Pioneer makes a great display, but is EXTREMELY difficult to deal with when something goes wrong. Thats because they are loosing money on plasma despite in general having a GREAT product-- if you get one without faults. Check out there dead pixel return policy. Holy smokes. Samsung has gotten better by the way, put a couple years back they had big time QA problems.

4. Some folks get the warranty for piece of mind and are good with that. Some dont. Me? I Didnt. I had two years with the credit card. I have had the Panasonic plasma for three years ( plus) with no problems yet.

5. And yes- Panny is releasing a torrential flood of stuff over the coming months, although I am not sure how much downward pressure on pricing will occur. Expect about 5500 for the 58 inch commerical display and maybe 7500 for the commerical 65 inch 1080P display. A rough guess with minimal inside information other than the whispers about the 65 ich 1080P consumer model goin for 9 grand msrp. Commerical at 1500 less is reasonable and consistent with hisorical pricing patterns.
I just purchased a Pioneer 5060HD about 3 months ago and I am not a big fan on extended warranties, but I did not purchase a $1000.00 TV. I felt since the TV was almost $5k that some sort of extended warranty was needed. My dealer, not BB, but a local guy sold me an extended waranty for 2 more years after the manufacturer's warranty expired (manufacturers warranty 1 year for the 5060HD). I felt that $200.00 was worth the investment. If the price was $500.00 I would have thought otherwise.
I paid for the peace of mind that comes with the extended warranty. I wasn't thrilled with paying for the extended warranty, but I rationalized it as an insurance policy on my entertainment investment. If anything goes wrong - no worries.
When was the first time you heard from an extended warranty?

I think is a money making strategy that is based only on probability of failure i.e. I sell 100 and get 50 people to buy the extended warr. ergo I make 25 grand that might take a hit of ca 1300 dls if one plasma fails .... not bad business math

Quality control and manufacturing techniques have drastically evolved in the last 20 years I'm not saying there are no lemons out there but the probability of getting one is not that high...... paradox is that information spreading i.e. internet forums seems to make a problem more
likely to ocurr and it helps the extended warranty campaigners