Ohm Walsh Micro Talls: who's actually heard 'em?

Hi Peter,
Yeah, I know what you mean. I am sure the 400W/channel mono blocks are going to be more fun and dynamic. I think to be fair to my wallet and to not get myself in trouble, I am going to hold off on the mono blocks until I get familiarized with my setup. meanwhile, I am going to do my homework and see what option will suite me and the wallet best.

Good way to go, at least you prove to your self what's needed.
Most small brands do have a trial period, not a bad way to go when 
you're ready to go.

BREAKING NEWS:
rodm_2001 will need more power.........🇸🇪

I agree the more clean power and current with the ohms the better.   Whether one needs it or not is a different story.  Personally id always go with  more clean power and current for the most fun. 

Js used a high power newer Peachtree amp to demo the ohms at ny audio show last year fwiw.  

Using with powered subs changes the story.      Almost any good quality modest power amp should do very well.     Impedance curves ive seen did not indicate a hard load at higher frequencies.  Power requirements always increase exponentially as the frequency gets lower.   Poor or muddy bass is a double whammy in that it also tends to muddy the midrange.   

*S*  Good, back on topic...roll on, gentlemen.

Ciao, peter, maps...see you on the avenues. ;)

Yes if you use a sub your speaker will work less hard no doubt, but only one problem.
The unit (receiver,integrated) must have a X-over or it's going to be a little hard to separate the bass from midrange, tweeter action.
BUT.....But someone just said, I will use the X-over in the sub/subs. I never liked doing just that, more connections, more speaker cable, and if you try to save money you most likely have a inexpensive sub which equals crappy electronics and questionable bass...

Damn it just buy a better amp....lol 🇸🇪