Amps from the 1980's -- What gear holds up sonically? Reliably?
Well, this is interesting, I don’t know which is right, but this article claims the first series of the Nak amps were better? http://www.tonepublications.com/old-school/nakamichi-pa-7-amplifier/ Per other threads, the original PA-7 was pure class A and 150W/ch instead of 225W/ch Best, E |
My 40 year old Marantz is a bit older than the subject timeframe, but I completely agree that units 30 years old or more should be completely recapped. My 2252 is completely recapped and it's a night and day difference. Through my Focal 936's it casts a smooth, rich, dynamic, wide and deep soundstage. I'm not a big believer in antique speakers, but some of the old circuits can still sound respectable. I'd like to run across an old Threshold one of these days. I'm sure better circuits in front of these speakers will pay off, but this old Marantz still pleases and impresses. |
Hmm, another "back in the day" thread. I guess its inevitable to recount how good the high end was back in the 80’s, and no doubt the good brands have lasted year after year. But 30+ year old components are going to develop issues and start to operate out of spec. Yes I know that there will be individual amps that it seem time can’t kill, but those would be in the minority. And to find a tech that really knows old electronics is getting rare. But it’s okay, amp design is not exactly rocket science, and many technological advances have occurred since the 80’s. A lot of new gear these days is actually pretty good too. |
Hi 213! For many of us who have been in the hobby for a long time these threads are ways of us sharing our experiences over time and connecting with other long-time hobbyists. A trip down memory lane if you will. This is also a good way to talk trends/fads and look at the winding road Hi-Fi has been on. At the same time, all of my audio gear is less than 4 years old. :) Best, E |
