@georgehifi
As far as I know Nelson doesn't design anything with BJT outputs. I'm almost certain BJTs aren't the output devices because they don't tolerate being biased up to a full amp well at all. Beyond that, they have poor slew rates compared to FETs and he believes in high bandwidth. I'm quite sure it uses MOSFETs. I don't think he had a suitable supply of the big JFETs he likes to design with lately when the INT-60 was designed. I seriously doubt the numbers of MOSFETs in the INT-60 pose any current limitations. I'm listening to some Bassnectar through an F5 running very hot rails and no current limiting, powering a pair of Focals, and if there's some limit to the current those 4 little MOSFETs will push, I'm not FEELING it. I think this F5 is the best amp I've ever heard. If the INT-60 is anything like it, I'd snatch it right up.
As far as I know Nelson doesn't design anything with BJT outputs. I'm almost certain BJTs aren't the output devices because they don't tolerate being biased up to a full amp well at all. Beyond that, they have poor slew rates compared to FETs and he believes in high bandwidth. I'm quite sure it uses MOSFETs. I don't think he had a suitable supply of the big JFETs he likes to design with lately when the INT-60 was designed. I seriously doubt the numbers of MOSFETs in the INT-60 pose any current limitations. I'm listening to some Bassnectar through an F5 running very hot rails and no current limiting, powering a pair of Focals, and if there's some limit to the current those 4 little MOSFETs will push, I'm not FEELING it. I think this F5 is the best amp I've ever heard. If the INT-60 is anything like it, I'd snatch it right up.

