How do you determine how much to spend on speakers


Hello all,

I am just starting out in this HI-FI stuff and have a pretty modest budget (prospectively about 5K) for all. Any suggestions as to how funds should be distributed. At this stage, I have no interest in any analog components. Most notably, whether or not it is favorable to splurge on speakers and settle for less expensive components and upgrade later, or set a target price range and stick to it.

Thanks
krazeeyk
Al and others .... I read the last few posts and would like to add my 2 cents.

But before I post my comments, I'd like to paraphrase a couple of funny lines from Fiddler on the Roof. I think Tevya was caught up in an argument between two other villagers. The first villager made his point and Tevya said, "you're right." The second villager responded, and Tevya said, "you're right." Then both villagers exclaimed, "how can we both be right? Either Number One is right, or Number Two is right." And Tevya said, "you're right."

Well. I'm sure you get my point. Actually, I think the OP is asking a very good, but difficult to answer question. My answer is, "dunno." Reason: it has been my experience that I have been in "build out" mode for quite some time. During the build out phase, my knowledge and experience base has expanded quite a bit. I have switched out gear always seeking better performance from my system *as a whole.* What makes this endeavor incredibly difficult is that there are so few B&M stores around anymore which carry a wide range of models.

Although I don't think any link in the chain can be ignored, IME, the most difficult link to sort out is speakers. There's just so many subjective and objective variables in play, the least of which is NOT amplifier compatibility.

I apologize if my post comes off as a stream of rambling consciousness. I am just using a lot of space to say, "I don't know .... it depends."

Cheers,

Bruce
P.S. -- if you really want to focus on the downstream side of the house, then we should be talking about the spotty quality of the source material, which is the subject of many other Forum threads. After all "garbage in-garbage out."
Bruce (Bifwynne), thanks for your witty posts. IMO you're right :-)

Personally I've never followed any kind of formula. I just do a lot of research and as much listening as possible, and buy when a component that fits my financial comfort zone particularly excites me.

Best regards,
-- Al
You are all right. I recently read about someone who has a few different systems because they do different things. I feel most all our quality equipment today can be made to sound exceptional. So what ever speaker we get it can be made to sound great . Or whatever source can be made to sound great. I have found with my own systems optimizing them has been very satisfying. I then go to these shows RMAF or B & M stores and wonder how my system sounds so much better. Then quickly I realize why. It has taken awhile but now I can forget about the next best greatest amazing material and groove to the funky square waves without nary a distortion if you can catch my balloon man.
IMO to many in "HEA" devalue the importance of the speaker. Yes, I agree "garbage in garbage out" but putting 10k+ of electronics to extract every last nuance of a compromised $2k speaker is wasteful spending. My best advice is to go one or two steps above your original speaker plans. This way you avoid the finacial loss of upgrading and the PIA it is to sell and ship speakers!