Rowland versus ARC


Anybody compare the products of these two company and have any opinions or favorites?

I realize one can be tubes and the other is solid state but I've heard Rowland has the warmth and musicality of tubes and the dynamic slam of SS.

What say you guys?

roxy1927
@serious7,

That's quite a interesting setup you have, btw great system. I bet your system sounds phenomenal. 

When i went from all solid state (Classe, Krell) to all tube ARC setup, I was in same dilemma with my power hungry monsters - B&W 800D2. First thought was to change the speakers but I wasn't quite ready to give up my beloved 800's. Since I prefer not to use a sub for 2 ch audio, I end up going the bi-amping route with Class D (LF) and Tube (MF/HF) amps. And this is by far the best setup i have had in 15 plus years of tinkering in high-end audio. 

In fact, I have managed to surprise few friends on how good 800's sound with tube amp feeding the mid's and high's and Class D powering up a pair of 10' bass drivers. 
Not sure what I'm missing......But I've been using my ARC Reference 3 to drive drive TWO subs (albeit, powered) with no problem at all.  (B&W ASW800's).  I'm also powering a McIntosh MC452 and ARC VT-100 with outstanding results IMHO.
Rowland is very quiet,very dynamic and very accurate.ARC is very good stage with great depth and airy extended highs this can be improved with NOS tubes such as Amperex but it will cost you.Both are wonderful companies with proven track records.Good luck.