@johnk
You have and extremely weird idea of innovation. Practically nothing that exists today is the result of a genuinely new idea. If you really want to take the concept of technological evolution to it's extreme, it's completely accurate to say all you're hearing is mankind's mastery of fire. There's nothing all that new about the internal combustion engine. We just figured out how to put fire in a can. There's practically no genuinely new ideas that gave rise to the speaker. The only real innovation was a means of more accurately controlling the input of energy into a system. Pretty much the rest is minor adaptations from technologies hundreds of years old. So I guess I'm failing to see why you point to the 1930's as some paradigm of innovation.
You have and extremely weird idea of innovation. Practically nothing that exists today is the result of a genuinely new idea. If you really want to take the concept of technological evolution to it's extreme, it's completely accurate to say all you're hearing is mankind's mastery of fire. There's nothing all that new about the internal combustion engine. We just figured out how to put fire in a can. There's practically no genuinely new ideas that gave rise to the speaker. The only real innovation was a means of more accurately controlling the input of energy into a system. Pretty much the rest is minor adaptations from technologies hundreds of years old. So I guess I'm failing to see why you point to the 1930's as some paradigm of innovation.

