Dynavector 20x2 vs Audio Technica ART-9.

"too polite for harder hitting genres"

I guess that could be up for debate also...I listen to many styles and made sure to play my beloved early Zep and Pink Floyd's DSOTM.

Being a couple of years back, I recall the difference as hearing subtle passages presented a tiny bit more....recognizable or in focus, for lack of better descriptors? Drum authority from Bonzo was still present, but things like the ambient stuff in DSOTM-"On the Run"-the panning of the footsteps were a tad more "real?"

This was AFTER I purchased the 9. The fact my phono stage needed a little more oomph from the extra gear$(Xfrmr) was a deal breaker as well. Im quite happy however, with the 9. IMO, I just can't justify investing 2X or more for a cart without thinking my table should be upgraded as well(upgrade anxiety)

You won't go wrong with either of your picks. Good luck

These types of questions are best answered by the OP.

Why does one ask another what one is considering as their frame of reference?

I just don’t know.

FWIW, VPI used to sell a cartridge under its own brand that was a modified Dynavector.  I am currently using my second 20X2 on my VPI Scout and love it.  I compared the new cartridge to an Ortofon Bronze moving magnet.  The Ortofon was pleasant but lacking in dynamics and the drive of live music.

I've not had the fortune to hear the AT cart. but have always read good things about it.

ONE CAVEAT...I was fortunate to have a real pro mount and adjust my newest Dynavector.  Getting the set-up exactly right makes a huge difference regardless of the brand.

Maybe if this were a car forum-
what handles curves better, Ferrari or  77' Buick Regal?

https://images.search.yahoo.com/images/view;_ylt=AwrTcXLzDdFZkf4An.SKnIlQ;_ylu=X3oDMTIzNjNmMnJsBHNlY...

"Why does one ask another what one is considering as their frame of reference?"

Perhaps one would like to hear the opinions of others that have heard both carts. So would one refrain from posting snarky comments? Thanks.