Do I have to spend $4000 plus to get a better sounding speaker than GET model 7 ?


I have owned a pair of Golden Ear Technology 7's speaker for almost 3 years. I think they sound very good in my current set-up.  I bought them unheard based on the rave reviews they received at CES 2012. My concern is that if I was to invest in a speaker that is $3500-$4000, it may prove to be only marginally or fairly better. I am not saying that the GET's 7's are the best bargain in audio at $1395.  My experience with them is they are  very accurate with low distortion, but don't throw a particularly wide or deep soundstage. 

I have considered( not necessarily auditioned) Revel F-206;  Focal Aria 936;  Paradign F85;  PSB T-2';  Ryan 630;  B&W CM9S   Dynaudio X-34;  Duevel "Venus"  Audio Physic Sitara 25 and Tempo 25  All of the indicated speakers (except AP and Duevel) fall in the $3000-$4500 retail price range 

ProAc floor standers are off the scope in price, (often, even used)   Anything I buy will be used, because California sales tax is 8.5%,  and I can stretch my dollars buying used. 

Any recommendations are welcomed especially if based on you own experience with a particular speaker or brand.


Thank you, S.J     

sunnyjim

k-a  Thank you for your recent reply and comments about the Aria 936.  Seems to make good sense what you say. 

Regarding the Ascend Sierra you mentioned  Was that model fitted with RAAL tweeter which supposedly ups the performance of  the highs without brightness on edge??

S.J

I think a $1,000 speaker might get one area of a $4000. Speaker right.  
Maybe. The public is not stupid a company won't price a speaker in the wrong competition.    You
Get what you pay for IMO
  
@sunnyjim 
Yes, it did have the RAAL. This wasn't all that long ago. As you've seen above folks make very bold statements about the RAAL tweeter making it sound like it's leaps and bounds beyond anything else. The fellow who actually heard both in his own room side by side gave the impression the difference was much more subtle than he'd been led to believe it was. The Focals did some things better, the Sierra's other things. Let me see if I can find the thread and link it. 
I couldn’t find it.
The one truth about the 936 pretty much nobody familiar with them will debate is they reveal gear in a rather brutal way. Cables, amps, sources... That’s a bonus to a guy like me who’s not entrenched in a stack of gear, but a drawback to someone who’s already got a good stack. As I’ve mentioned, mine are powered by a beefed up Pass F5 clone; a pure class A push-pull, ultra-high bandwidth amp operating with a class A envelope up over 80 watts. These speakers are revealing of small changes to the input source pin balance of .2 ohm either way. If that kind of transparency is concerning, definitely listen on your own gear first.
Post removed