What exactly is colored sound?

If you actually had a copy of an original master tape, for example, and you played it on two different systems, lets say they are extreme high end, I bet that master tape would sound different on each to some degree even if you used the same reel to reel device.  So, unless you were present at the actual recording and heard it with your own ears, would you really know how it sounded?

 I guess that the only thing I could think of is that I want a trombone to sound like a trombone, a piano to sound like a piano and so on.  I cannot say I have heard systems that a trombone sounds like a trumpet lets say.  Whether in a hall that sounds warm or neutral, well I guess if we want to hear it in a warm hall, we may decide to tweek our systems to that way of listening and so on.

Commercial recording engineers are endeavoring to make a "good" sounding recording, sure, but what good means to them may be very different from what an audiophile means by good. In all the studios I’ve been recorded in, the engineers have mics they have come to prefer for specific applications. A lot of them like the Shure SM57, for instance---a PA vocal mic, for snare drum. The mic has a presence peak deliberately engineered into the mic’s frequency response, to make vocals coming through a PA more audible. Used as a recording mic, it adds the same presence region boost to snare drums, making them "pop" and "cut" in a mix better than does a mic with a flatter frequency response. Those engineers are not in the least concerned with capturing the inherent, true timbre of the drum, but rather to get a "good" snare sound, one that will suit the sound he is after in the entire mix.

I have recordings of the same snare drum, a Ludwig Supraphonic 400 (the snare preferred by John Bonham, Alex Van Halen, Roger Hawkins, and many others, myself included. John and Alex in the 6.5" deep version, Roger and myself the 5"), made in different studios by different engineers, and though the drum in all the recordings is obviously a Supraphonic, the same drum sounds very different in some of them.

Listening to a commercial Pop recording, the listener has absolutely no idea what the recording "should" sound like---what an accurate reproduction of the recording actually is. The idea of using exquisitely engineered High End components to reproduce the trash on most commercial products is actually comical. Who can blame a music-loving consumer for being more interested in a "good" sounding system than in an "accurate", uncolored one? Of what value is an uncolored system if the recordings are colored to begin with? Then there is the problem of audiophile loudspeakers being very different sounding than studio monitors (Oy. You wanna talk about colored?!), a subject too complicated to go into here.

There is the old argument that the more transparent a system, the more it will reveal the excellent sound of good recordings, but also the poor sound of bad ones. I believe most audiophiles try to assemble a system that balances the ability to faithfully reproduce good recordings with the ability to make average or poor recordings sound as tolerable as possible. That’s a tricky balancing act! Good "enough", but not "too" good.

In all the studios I’ve been recorded in, the engineers have mics they have come to prefer for specific applications. A lot of them like the Shure SM57, for instance---a PA vocal mic, for snare drum. The mic has a presence peak deliberately engineered into the mic’s frequency response, to make vocals coming through a PA more audible. Used as a recording mic, it adds the same presence region boost to snare drums, making them "pop" and "cut" in a mix better than does a mic with a flatter frequency response. Those engineers are not in the least concerned with capturing the inherent, true timbre of the drum, but rather to get a "good" snare sound, one that will suit the sound he is after in the entire mix.