MONO cartridge recommendation


Hi,
I was all set to get the ORTOFON 2M MONO SE cartridge to play the Beatles Mono Vinyl box set.

But it seems they do not offer it in any longer. Anyone have a suggestion on a true Mono cartridge $550-1000 range?

MM or MC in the 2.5mV range for my preamp

thanks 

 mike
128x128mikepaul
Unless you have a hum problem there’s no need to also use the mono switch and if you have a mono cart. Anyway try it both ways and see what sounds best to you. The mono switch will help cancel hum if that is an issue. Mono cartridges are prone to severe hum problems 
mofimadness wrote:
I also have an Audio Technica AT-Mono/3. It’s a pretty decent little cart and isn’t very expensive.
I have that cartridge, too. It’s officially imported and sold by LpGear for $189.99. I got mine through a Japanese storefront on Amazon for a mere $112 and change two years ago. Dollar-to-Yen exchanges fluctuate over time and it’s currently $127.95 from that vendor.

Here are the 20 Amazon customer reviews for this cartridge: https://www.amazon.com/Audio-Technica-AT-MONO3-LP-Moving-Cartridge/dp/B0002ERE2Q/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&ie=UTF8&qid=1509037302&sr=8-1&keywords=audio+technica+at-mono3%2FLP

I really like this cartridge. I won’t dispute that you might get some higher highs and lower lows from more expensive mono carts, but there is a fundamental honesty to this cartridge that I find endearing. It has a full, rich tonal balance while maintaining good detail. Internal wiring is PCOCC (monocrystal) copper.

I bought mine specifically for playing my 2014 release of the Beatles mono LP collection. After playing that colIection with a stereo cart for a full year, I was not disappointed with the mono cart; in fact I was enlightened. I also found that I had far more mono LPs than I realized, both modern reissues (e.g., Beach Boys) and vintage LPs of all kinds pulled from thrift shops, antique pavilions, and bargain bins.

Right now I’m listening to a 1969 mono Capitol pressing of "Echoes of a 16th Century Cathedral" performed by the Roger Wagner Chorale. I got it for 49 cents at an antiques pavilion, and all the music is intact and with the mono cartridge the presentation is dead quiet. With a stereo cartridge it is unbearably noisy.

My wife, who grew up singing sacred vocal works, loves this album. It also quiets down the dogs.

I also have vintage mono jazz, a genuine Everest mono pressing of a Mozart woodwind ensemble, another 1969 mono pressing of the Vince Guaraldi Trio of "You’re a Good Man, Charlie Brown," reissues of Miles Davis on Prestige and Riverside, some Gene Krupa, etc.

True, I don’t have a collection of mono cartridges for comparison, but when I find what I’m looking for, I stop looking.

In theory, there is absolutely no difference between using the most common type of mono cartridge, which is a stereo cartridge within which the two channels have been bridged to give a mono output on both channels, and using the mono switch on your phono or linestage.  No difference at all.

Mikepaul, You should be using your mono switch. When and if you do buy a mono cartridge, you can be the one to tell us whether you hear any further improvement from using both the mono cartridge and the mono switch in unison.  There is certainly no possibility for harm in using both or either one alone.

The big question for me is whether the minority of available mono cartridges that are built for mono from the ground up (which means they have little or no vertical compliance and no capacity to respond in stereo to the groove modulations) are intrinsically superior in reproduction to the rest.
The big question for me is whether the minority of available mono cartridges that are built for mono from the ground up (which means they have little or no vertical compliance and no capacity to respond in stereo to the groove modulations) are intrinsically superior in reproduction to the rest.
My cartridge is vertically compliant but does not transmit any signal in the vertical plane. When the needle drops to the record surface, it makes no sound, whereas my AT150Sa makes a very loud THUMP!

When I play a munged up mono record with any stereo cartridge, the surface noise is unbearable. When I play the same record with the AT-MONO3/LP, all I hear is the music.

As I said before, I got my AT-MONO3/LP cart for a paltry $112. and change. KABUSA's mono switch is $229. My tonearm uses interchangeable headshells, so switching to the mono cart takes very little time including balancing and resetting the VTF.

If, however, I had a tonearm with integrated headshell and had to swap carts on one of those every time I had a hankering for mono, you can bet I'd buy the KABUSA mono switch instead.

I still stand by that modern mono carts with vertical compliance are a good thing as long as the cart doesn't transmit signal in the vertical plane.

Lewm, I have an Audio Research LS-1 specifically for it's Mode switch, which offers Stereo/Reverse/Mono/Left/Right from it's main outputs. It's fun to switch between Left and Right on early Stereo LP's, like The Beatles. Vocals on one channel, instruments on the other!

But a mono switch is not the same as a mono cartridge. The mono cartridge senses only the horizontal modulation, ignoring the vertical. The mono switch blends the left and right channels, and a stereo cartridge creates it's signal from both horizontal and vertical modulations. When tracing the grooves of a mono LP, the signal a stereo cartridge creates from the vertical modulation is of only the noise contained therein. It's true that putting your Mode switch to Mono when playing mono LPs with a stereo cartridge reduces groove noise, but how and why? I gotta get me a mono cartridge!

The Decca/London stereo cartridges are unique in having each of it's two coils dedicated to one of the two modulation planes, one for the horizontal, one for the vertical. That's the stereo version; London makes a mono cartridge, which omits the vertical coil. I'd say that's a "from the ground up" mono design!