....because everybody wants gigantic, hulking crates for speakers, a big honky sound, and 110dB, right? This doesn't strike me as a debate so much about dynamic range as it seems about just blaring, deafeningly loud regardless of the quality.
The foundation of excellent imaging is flat response across a broad range of volume. You cannot have excellent imaging without that characteristic. Huge speakers are very well known for sonically falling apart when operated below their optimum power. Speakers with smaller drivers remain much more coherent across a much wider power range at the cost of some dynamics at the their limits. It's a trade off and very few speakers deviate far from that truth. That's all I'm trying to say and have acknowledged here.
The foundation of excellent imaging is flat response across a broad range of volume. You cannot have excellent imaging without that characteristic. Huge speakers are very well known for sonically falling apart when operated below their optimum power. Speakers with smaller drivers remain much more coherent across a much wider power range at the cost of some dynamics at the their limits. It's a trade off and very few speakers deviate far from that truth. That's all I'm trying to say and have acknowledged here.

