Snake oil, fraud, confirmation bias


It is becoming increasingly apparent that many threads about legitimate topics devolve into one or more of the contributors here making claims of snake oil, fraud, or confirmation bias thereby derailing the conversation beyond the valid and relevant thread topic and this is getting ridiculous. For anyone here who honestly holds the position that there is snake oil and fraud in the world of Music Reproduction Systems I challenge them to prove their claims in court it should be an easy task based on the claims they make here in Audiogon  AND they will make a fortune because in the US once proven they can file a class action suit and profit enormously from the efforts of others to deceive. These people regularly claim that "there is no evidence" that things such as cables or fuses make a difference when in actual fact Audiogon is filled with evidence that these things make very real differences in Music Reproduction Systems of course those who claim fraud reject that evidence as "confirmation bias" but in absence of any documentation from them they are only repeating the claim they have made so many times that has been refuted many times here by those who have demonstrated to there satisfaction that they make a difference.   I think in actual truth the real fraudsters here are those that repeatedly make these claims of snake oil and fraud and often they have no experience to back up there claims they simply say the claims are impossible!
clearthink
Here we go. Clearthink failing to live up to his name once again. Foggythink would be more accurate. 
First of all, you clearly don't comprehend the process of discovery. You can't just go filing civil actions against unidentified parties. Discovery isn't the process of determining who the parties are. It's the process of determining the facts of the case. It's the obligation of the complainant to make possible service of notice and I've done it through process server and by publication. Generally for an established business service through publication is disallowed. In order to obtain service through publication you must demonstrated due diligence in seeking the respondent. Foggythink clearly knows nothing of legal procedure. 
Foggythink asserts there's some fortune to be made suing the snake oil scam artists. First, show my the lavishly wealthy snake oil scam artist. Fuses aren't that big a business and somebody needs to have riches in order for me to take them Next, show my the lavishly wealthy class action case beneficiary who's not a lawyer. Not many, are there?
As usual, Foggythink is a bit weak on the facts of reality. 
in actual fact Audiogon is filled with evidence that these things make very real differences in Music Reproduction Systems

Just hearsay, there is no "evidence" just what many of technically knowledgeable, believe is to be "expectation bias", after purchasers spend good money on what amounts to cheap snake oil product/s

Cheers George.
I wish there were ways to make specific threads "invisible" from our local/machine-specific view of A’gon.

Maybe Audiogon can add another section titled Audiobegone for all the naysayers.