Well, it seems like it's all of our business when somebody makes the choice to make their "evidence" a matter of public discussion. I'm not sure why people think they have the right to say dumb things in a public forum and not be challenged on them. Everybody sure is entitled to their opinion, including me, even it that means I think you're crazy. It's a two way street. If you don't like what somebody might think of your silly idea, it might not be a bad idea not to toss it out there. As the saying goes, it's better for people to think you're a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.
Rather than try to reduce the cable and tech talk forums to havens for snake oil believers, I think a dedicated snake oil forum would be best. "Snake Oil: The forum for beliefs that have no basis in the laws of physics" Granted, that would probably move the bulk of the content of those forums to the Snake Oil forum, but it would be really nice to have a place to talk about actual technology in a realistic and analytical way. That's my rub with the snake oil crowd. They accuse the "Naysayers" of disrupting their little powwows, but how many decently analytical discussions have they derailed with their bogus ideas of directional wires, magic rocks, burning in cables, and other silliness? I lurk a lot at diyaudio. What passes for tech talk over here would be an absolute laughing stock over there. What's more, you display a lack of understanding over there and you've got a crew of guys in just about every forum ready to school you with facts, figures, and formulas. These snake oil believers... They got NOTHING for facts. They lap up the ad copy jargon and mythical claims like gospel. They don't ask hard questions. They don't seek deep understanding. I built a simple amp. Good for me! Everybody should try building their own electronics if for no other reason than to learn and experience exactly what doing this or that to a piece of gear really does. I've thoroughly enjoyed dealing with and learning from the crowd over there. I am THRILLED to be able to ask a dumbish question and get an answer from Nelson Pass! I can't say I've actually seen any snake oil over there. It's interesting how an army of guys with soldering irons, scopes, and distortion analyzers deeply study what they're hearing until they know why they're hearing it. Not here though! "I hear it!" is the only evidence required. It's pathetic.
Rather than try to reduce the cable and tech talk forums to havens for snake oil believers, I think a dedicated snake oil forum would be best. "Snake Oil: The forum for beliefs that have no basis in the laws of physics" Granted, that would probably move the bulk of the content of those forums to the Snake Oil forum, but it would be really nice to have a place to talk about actual technology in a realistic and analytical way. That's my rub with the snake oil crowd. They accuse the "Naysayers" of disrupting their little powwows, but how many decently analytical discussions have they derailed with their bogus ideas of directional wires, magic rocks, burning in cables, and other silliness? I lurk a lot at diyaudio. What passes for tech talk over here would be an absolute laughing stock over there. What's more, you display a lack of understanding over there and you've got a crew of guys in just about every forum ready to school you with facts, figures, and formulas. These snake oil believers... They got NOTHING for facts. They lap up the ad copy jargon and mythical claims like gospel. They don't ask hard questions. They don't seek deep understanding. I built a simple amp. Good for me! Everybody should try building their own electronics if for no other reason than to learn and experience exactly what doing this or that to a piece of gear really does. I've thoroughly enjoyed dealing with and learning from the crowd over there. I am THRILLED to be able to ask a dumbish question and get an answer from Nelson Pass! I can't say I've actually seen any snake oil over there. It's interesting how an army of guys with soldering irons, scopes, and distortion analyzers deeply study what they're hearing until they know why they're hearing it. Not here though! "I hear it!" is the only evidence required. It's pathetic.

