Open Baffle. Why are they mostly limited to DIY?


I see a few hybrids from Vandersteen and Spatial Audio, but not much else. 
seanheis1

To your point, seanheis1, OB's are thought of only in terms of having all cone-type drivers, but some of the best actually use at least one ribbon, magnetic-planar, or similar type driver, usually a tweeter of course, in combination with a cone woofer. And many OB enthusiasts are also planar fans, some having a pair of those as well as OB's. I mean, planars are just OB's with non-cone drivers!

And snapsc, you're exactly right, OB ownership places the same demands upon one as do planars---3 to 5 feet minimum from the wall behind them.

One incorrect thing said above is that OB's require a lot of power. Actually, one thing OB users like is the design's generally high sensitivity. Many owners pair them with low-power single-ended amps. One exception is the Linkwitz OB's, which require not a lot of power over-all, but a separate power amp for each driver. A fairly complicated x/o is a big part of his designs.

@kalali  

They are also not very versatile and sound best only with certain type of music and certain upstream gear.
Can you elaborate further? Thanks.
@willemj 

and they need a lot of power
Not necessarily. What makes you say this? Thanks.
Open baffles don't always need a lot of power. I heard the spatial audio turbo m3 in salt lake at their assembly facility through the 25 wpc Rossi integrated.  They easily played at 90+ db 14 feet back. They sounded really good. Very smooth, detailed and huge sound stage. 
Willemj says they're inefficient because physics! Their efficiency depends on the size of the baffles and drivers. Once the wavelengths significantly exceed the size of the baffle the efficiency falls off a cliff. It's kinda why open baffle subwoofers never became a thing.