Sorry Tuxedocat, but the kinds of things like you just said are definitely the product of hype and trendiness. Eric's ideas about speakers are just a bit discombobulated from a technical standpoint and both the Reference and Sopra No.2 represent vastly better engineering and build quality, which I do believe produce a more refined sound.
As for the question of bass, I read the Stereophile measurements of the Sopra No.3, which has an identical low point as my 936's, and JA points out that with usual room boundary reinforcement achieving flat response to 20Hz shouldn't be a problem.
Assuming the No.2 measures pretty much as well as the No.3, which would be a reasonable expectation, it's a technically superior speaker. Ultimately it's up to taste as I've said before, but for me the beaming sort of dispersion you get from the AMT would push me towards the Focal as it's already done.
As for the question of bass, I read the Stereophile measurements of the Sopra No.3, which has an identical low point as my 936's, and JA points out that with usual room boundary reinforcement achieving flat response to 20Hz shouldn't be a problem.
Assuming the No.2 measures pretty much as well as the No.3, which would be a reasonable expectation, it's a technically superior speaker. Ultimately it's up to taste as I've said before, but for me the beaming sort of dispersion you get from the AMT would push me towards the Focal as it's already done.

