scientific double blinded cable test


Can somebody point to a scientific double blinded cable test?
nugat
a couple things......from 1793 to 1837 a cent was pure copper
                               from 1837 to 1857 a cent was made of bronze
(95% copper and 5 % tin and zinc)
                               from 1857 to 1864 a cent was made of 88% 
copper and 12 % nickel
                               from 1864 to 1962 a cent was once again made
from bronze ( 95% copper and 5% tin and zinc ) ,*with the exception
of 1943 when,due to WWII, a cent was zinc coated steel*
                               from 1962 to 1982 a cent was made from 95%
copper and 5% zinc (no tin )
                               from 1982 to present a cent is made from 97.5
zinc and 2.5 % copper  .........

as far as directionality....the faces on all coins face left except for****
( drumroll )  Abraham Lincoln
                                                  a copper coincidence? 

as for my two cents I'm with tommylion 
                               
All that you have to do to alter the sound of your cables is to disconnect them for a couple of minutes then plug them back in. Then you go aaahhh sounds better! And there is a good chance it WILL!!!! First you just cleaned your connection by some friction . 2nd you let any static charge bleed out. The 2nd one is a Direct TV trouble shooting protocol for 75 ohm cables. 
All that you have to do to alter the sound of your cables is to disconnect them for a couple of minutes then plug them back in. Then you go aaahhh sounds better! And there is a good chance it WILL!!!! First you just cleaned your connection by some friction . 2nd you let any static charge bleed out. The 2nd one is a Direct TV trouble shooting protocol for 75 ohm cables.

But try hearing a difference disconnecting and reconnecting if that were performed blind :)

Seriously folks, I appreciate everyone's interest, whether you agree with my position, clearthink, or that of your own. 

But the bottom line is the offer I've made herein this thread is that of my own, so it stands to reason that so too are the terms. Apparently it's too much to ask that I be contacted privately. I'll let you guys determine in the court of public opinion who means business and who is "just another winkly dinkler".

gdhal
"
I thought we already discussed the matter and were to proceed to the next step. My attorney will create the necessary protective umbrella for me, and presumably your attorney will create a protective umbrella for you."
This is completely not true the next step is to design the means by which the test will be conducted the place the test will be conducted the associated equipment that will be used with the test to be conducted the proctors to the test that we will have conducted and how the public will both be able to participate in the test to be conducted and/or witness for themselves the test to be conducted those are some of the preliminary matters that remain to be resolved and these will be reviewed, discussed, negotiated and agreed upon here in public or otherwise your $25,000 USD offer is ovbiously not sincere and you have undertaken the means to extricate yourself so which is it. Do you want to discuss this plan here or move it into the shadows and darkness where you can "chicken" out and then blame the outcome on someone other than yourself?