As posted above, there has lots of positive and negative comments on
Audiogon about MQA coded albums. Of
course, everyone is entitled to their own opinion that I enjoy reading. I listen to Tidal MQA coded albums since I
feel they sound slightly better (sometimes) than regular albums. The music seems clearer and with less background noise.
I do NOT LIKE the Audio Manufacturers having to pay for the MQA license and noticed that some support this extra cost and many others do not. In addition, I know that some people “believe
that supporting MQA means handing over the entire recording industry to an
external standards organization”. If this statement is true (is it?), it is also a concern to me.
I own the Aurender N10 Music Server (it decodes the first MQA layer) and has 10,000+ MQA
Coded albums from Tidal that I enjoy. However, I would NOT PAY extra for MQA coded albums. I also know that some Manufacturers want nothing to do with the MQA coding process.
I continue to believe we have too many audio formats that make it
very confusing for people new to audio and maybe everyone else (such as who does the unfolding of the different MQA layers?). Some DAC's support MQA and many others do not and will NOT. There is much confusion, concern and debate around MQA coded albums, so
I am waiting to see what happens.