NAD 1600 Receiver

I have the 1600 preamp/tuner. Sounds competitive with the expensive stuff!

I bought the 2600A power amp new, and still have it. Liked it very much back then, but not quite as much today.

If I remember correctly, the 7160 was the receiver version of my amp

Still using a decades-old 2125 receiver in a 4th system. NAD was amazingly well-built and offered tremendous value. From what I've read, that's not the case today, sadly. Really liked their products.

If I remember correctly, the 7160 was the receiver version of my amp

@trelja , Joe, I believe the NAD 7600 was the receiver version of the 2600 power amp:

http://www.hifi-classic.net/review/nad-7600-133.html

The NAD 1600 is a preamp/tuner, not a receiver.

I’ve tried other new preamplifiers and I’ve sent them back. I can’t find anything that I like as well as the NAD. I’m glad to hear of other favorable experiences. I too have heard that NAD is not what it used to be. I acquired a BlueSound Node 2 streamer recently. Proof positive that the organization isn’t what it used to be.
I use the Node to stream Spotify, have a Cambridge cxc cd transport running thru the Node, use a vintage jvc cassette tape deck,vintage jvc turntable. All thru the NAD to a McIntosh 2125 to Sansui 3500 and Olympus 1100 speakers utilizing an A+B setup. I’m now trying to integrate a computer into the system. Fun !!!!!!