whart
The trick, to me (given that I am somewhat challenged in the math/physics/hard sciences department), is to translate the science into something that is readily understandable by those untutored in the relevant fields. I know that can lead to oversimplification but my experience working with witnesses as a lawyer is that the judge (and jury) needs to understand it.
>>>>I think you just put your finger on it. According to what I’ve been seeing on audio forums for nigh on twenty five years there’s a huge communication barrier between science minded individuals and the rest the general population, including English majors, Econ. Majors, History majors, what have you. It just doesn’t compute. Even drawing a picture doesn’t work. That’s what Richard Feynman tried to do, somewhat unsuccessfully. Does that seem too harsh?
The trick, to me (given that I am somewhat challenged in the math/physics/hard sciences department), is to translate the science into something that is readily understandable by those untutored in the relevant fields. I know that can lead to oversimplification but my experience working with witnesses as a lawyer is that the judge (and jury) needs to understand it.
>>>>I think you just put your finger on it. According to what I’ve been seeing on audio forums for nigh on twenty five years there’s a huge communication barrier between science minded individuals and the rest the general population, including English majors, Econ. Majors, History majors, what have you. It just doesn’t compute. Even drawing a picture doesn’t work. That’s what Richard Feynman tried to do, somewhat unsuccessfully. Does that seem too harsh?

