Furutech GTX NCF receptical break in, how long

The $1.5 billion is just speakers. Not Bluetooth, portables, or all-in-one solutions like Sonus. The $3 billion lumps all that other jazz in. 
In all reality a lot of people look into this stuff, but then they run across silliness like fuses, outlets, resonators, magnets, platforms, and all kinds of hokey snake oil tweaks that people make crazy bold claims about mixed in with speakers, amps, and sources. Very, very few, including myself, see any value in gear prone to big, bold changes made by a fuse or an outlet. It's a radically alien concept from an electrical engineering standpoint, and from the standpoint of millions of people using highly sophisticated electronics on a minute by minute basis. The broad indulgence in the snake oil in this hobby isn't selling the hobby well. We don't live in a world where fanciful delusions sell well. Folks want the numbers. How much horsepower? How many MPG's? How many gigahertz? How many pounds? How many watts? How much contrast? How many pixels? I'm not at all surprised that the most successful HiFi companies are the onces that actually talk about the technical merits of their products. There used to be companies, like Marantz, that actually printed the circuit diagram on the top of the case!

Based on my experience with the NCF outlets, they take about 400 hours to settle down and at least 600 hours to run in. Before settling down, expect the unexpected as the sound will drastically vary each day.

So, everyone who is reading many of kosst’s posts, please read with a grain of salt.  Kosst has apparently made it his life mission to make sure we all feel silly for listening to different things and actually hearing differences.  Kosst, either you are really a troll in some fashion, or you really cannot hear differences with rhodium connectors or burn in, or you are actually letting your mind believe that you are hearing differences because you can see them on a scope.  It could actually very well be a combination of the last two items.

No, Aux, it really couldn't be the latter or the a combination of the latter two because I don't own a scope. I guess you didn't actually read what I wrote. Scroll up there a little bit where I made my point about how well designed gear should be impervious to this stuff. I seemed to get some agreement on that philosophy. And it's a correct philosophy to have. 
I ended up getting some rhodium plated bananas for my ESS because they were short and fit the posts on the bottom of the speaker. Meh... They conducted electricity. Good. Tried them on the Focals. They conducted electricity there, too. Good. The construction of my cables made VASTLY more difference than the gold or rhodium bananas. Those made NO difference at all. I'm very happy with those cables. I won't put much thought into the spades I plan to install on them beyond them being conductive and fitting inside the funky posts on the F5. 

This is starting to sound like one of these two threads: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/new-tweak-its-fantastic
or: https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/the-new-synergistic-research-blue-fuses
I'm not going to waste any more time trying to reason with someone that's theory opinioned but hasn't tried a specific product themselves, but has all the amswers.