SACD


SACD sounds better right???
all of my stuf flooded 4’ 4 days.
i have no money but I am replacing a headphone setup and I feel I must have in CD player SACD because it sounds much better, am I right?????? Help!!
jimmycg
It just popped into my head that SACD failing drove me back into vinyl with a real commitment. So where I put many thousands of dollars into both software and hardware over the past decade plus simply came down to this.

Although I’ve heard very good CD players and DACs, even as far as things have come today, they don’t satisfy me the way records do. SACD did
SACD as with vinyl has really never died.
New ones are arriving from Japan every week. In the classical music catagory, new labels, as with Pentatone and Linn are issuing splendid re-issues and new recordings. To my ears they do sound superior to the usual red book 16 bit CDs.

I love my vinyl, 7 1/2 i.p.s. reel to reel tapes, Hi-Rez 24 bit downloads, Pure Audio Blu-Ray, and SACD. They all reproduce the master tapes better than CD. There are always ‘stinkers’ in any of these formats. And there are a few CDs that sound really fine.

Perhaps SACD flopped as did DVD Audio in the USA. We live in an era of iTune downloads with their limited bit rate. But, even with some pop albums they are perfectly fine. 

Still again in classical music the SACD is gaining momentum again. 
Now, if only the Japanese issues wouldn’t be so very expensive.

That all sounds well and good but there’s one teeny little problem. That problem is newer SACDs, Hi Res Downloads, even highly touted SHM CDs and SACDs from Nippon are showing highly compressed. The trend is not your friend. 😢
SACD are expensive. Used Cds can be had for a buck a pop at store like Half Price Books.I bought thousands of $1 $2 CDs there.You never see SACD used, and if so, they are very expensive.
My experience is SACD typically have no background. No 'air' of the room or environment. Just the music from a black hole.I just bought a SACD player mainly because it decoded CDs via Toslink so well... Using DSD. (Marantz SA-10)
I would not bother buying SACD. I own less than twenty, and most of those are Bob Dylan dual layer I got on sale. On the other hand I own 2,500 CDs. after dumping a thousand CDs in a weeding frenzy.SACD do NOT sound any better than good CDs. And both formats are all over the place for actual sound quality when played back in a quality system.
So for the OP my suggestion is buy the SACD PLAYER, but actually buy used CDs dirt cheap. eBay has tons for dirt cheap, so does Amazon marketplace. (I bought piles from Amazon for a few bucks, Usually the shipping was way higher than the cost of the $0.50 CD!)So to maximise value. Go for the CDs.
+1 elizabeth
Have been following your lead for over a year and find the CD approach, when up sampled with SoX in JRiver, provides an audio result fully equivalent to SACDs.
BTW, some SACDs are notable, especially the Grammy award winning Dire Straits "Brother in Arms." In a 5-channel environment, this one is riveting.