Sorry again
tweak1 OP some just don't stay on topic, rather complain about the wording of my product instead, as you can see even Al gets sucked off topic by them..
Cheers George
Cheers George
Have Passive Preamps Finally Come of Age?
Sorry again
tweak1 OP some just don't stay on topic, rather complain about the wording of my product instead, as you can see even Al gets sucked off topic by them.. Cheers George |
@georgehifi I think you protest a bit too much. It is you that continues to get off topic, most recently with your negative comment (or three) about another equipment designer/manufacturer’s website content. You then get all defensive when I point out another website having inaccurate content about its product specifications. (I did say “hilarious” in my post, which you opted to take as being a serious comment other than for what it is.) If one stays on topic and perhaps one won’t generate additional commentary. |
Just stay on topic as
tweak1 OP asked, so I don't have to respond to your
“hilarious”
off topic remarks. Cheers George |
Post removed |
Hence the statement I quoted above appears to me to be incorrect, and George’s statement that "interconnects are the determining factor here" is likely to be correct.@almarg This seems to me a bit of a catch-22, as the very high impedance of the LDR at certain settings pretty well means that any cable is going to impose a bandwidth limit so in effect you could never have full bandwidth. With a 3 foot high quality cable (which would have 300pf) in such cases you would have a roll-off that is very real world. Another issue is that a high impedance thus imposed could have negative HF bandwidth effects due to Miller capacitance in the amplifier. The latter is one topic that rarely gets mention in these passive/active debates but its very real. |