There it is! When the pseudo skeptic’s back is up against the wall he lashes out out with the usual attacks. It’s the other side that’s abandoned rational debate and science, resorting to personal attacks, changing the subject, making baseless accusations, muddying the entire discourse, and misinterpreting the pseudo skeptic’s argument. There is no acknowledgment of or rebuttal of the counter arguments. Just a lotta who shot John.
You’ve gone all Pee Wee Herman on us, Geoff. "I know you are but what am I" or "I’m rubber you’re glue" are not valid or particularly constructive arguments.
If, on the other hand, you’re agreeing with me that proponents of expensive tweaks and AC power cables are indeed engaging in all kinds of ad hominem because they cannot articulate or elucidate any measurable or repeatable improvements, and your most recent post was just a clever parody of this behavior, let’s start reporting these "psuedo-______" people to the mods! They’re disruptive!
If I’m wrong on both counts, please enlighten me and point me to the scientific experiments that I am not acknowledging, whereby AC mains cables have been shown to make an audible difference in a controlled environment or with full transparency to the listener as to what was being changed?
I've been commenting in good faith here up to and including the links I've posted that point to actual tests which have been conducted. If you're here in good faith, please point me to the objective tests which prove the opposite and we can agree to disagree or I will admit that I'm wrong.