Marantz SA-10 arriving Monday!


I've been hearing and reading all I can about this player during this last year. I have a 6005 right now and it's a nice player but not as good as my analog rig (10k) so it's not a fair comparison. Elizabeth mentioned that her SA-10 is better than her analog. I will be comparing the 2 SACD players side by side. I have at least 3 CD's in which I have duplicates. I'm fascinated about how the circuitry upsamples to DSD SACD. Well not exactly but somehow an improvement over Redbook CD. I have a 2" thick maple block coming in the same day for it. It's going to be a long weekend. I know it can't work miracles on all CD's. If there is jitter in the recording then supposedly you will never get that out. Speak up if I'm wrong about that.
blueranger
Post removed 
I have been using a variety of rock music and dance (Madonna) to break it in. It still doesn't make a poorly mastered CD sound good. I just bought LZ HOTH double CD with bonus tracks andis very bright and very shrill. I used Shine ola and did a Bedini clarifier spin with a super black hole damper disc. Has anyone else noticed that a bad CD won't change much even on a good player. Now the Marantz does make a large proportion of my collection much more musical. I have found that many more records were mastered well than an equal amount of CDs 
I do not share the pessimism about CDs with blueranger. I would say only a very few CDs I own have bad HF sound. All the stuff about the HF, to me is the rest of the system, and perhaps lack of (correct??) power conditioning? I am 100% a high frequency nutcase. It HAS to be perfect! and I own Magnepan 20.7s. They have one of the very best HF transducers ever. Everything in my system is geared to perfect high frequency reproduction. EVERYTHING.And I can say the Marantz SA-10 delivers!!!!
SO I suggest to blueranger his system is busted someplace else and not from the SA-10? (sorry, not meaning to cause any insult) I use a tube pramp as a ’glorified tube buffer. mainly at this point I just like the added warmth, and no longer to ’hide’ the digital grunge. But I first got it TO HIDE THE GRUNGE. years back.Cheap ones are not worth the trouble. I had used a VAC Standard, until it went dead, and now just got a Conrad Johnson ACT 2 as a fancy tube buffer.
ADDED: Now I am not using new,Rock recordings with grunge bands... So it may be true about recent CD recordings.. I stopped listening to ’new’ music at some point.. I own so much great stuff I do not need to find new stuff..
roxy54, Sorry I did not read your question at earlier posting.I enjoy stuffing my five disc players and letting them play for many hours. I have done this since the late 80’s. The first thing I tested when I had a loaner Marantz SA-10 to audition from my dealer was to hook up the five disc! I played that via Toslink for a day, then I played a Technics DVDA-10 with Cd via SPDIF for a day, Then I played the few SACDs I owned and CDs via the SA-10 transport. Then went back to playing via the five disc/Toslink. The fact the SA-10 could play CDs so wonderfully from the five disc is THE REASON I BOUGHT IT.
And of the 3 ways, the least good was the five disc. I could tell it was playing, but the loss is so small it just does not top the ease of use,(I would call the difference the same as swapping two nearly as good IC) plus saving the SA-10 transport. (saving the transport, If I plan on using the SA-10 as a DAC, it will NEVER wear out. never is a longer than rest of my life long) The Technics sits, I use it once in awhile to play a single disc now and then. It DOES sound slightly better than the $40 from eBay five disc changer...And the SA-10 playing CDs or SACDs sounds really nice. But NOT enough nicer to use it all the time, instead of the five disc changers (of which I own ten. Yup ten distinct CD five disc changers. I like them. They like me. I have a lifetime’ supply. No kidding.
Obviously not all five disc changers are great as a transport. But I like the ones I have. They sound great Toslink out. used them that way for fifteen years at least. And no. I would not say which brands and models I use. I may want more of them???So the sound is nearly perfect ,and certainly can give me goosebumps if I run the signal through a tube preamp used as a glorified tube buffer. My current glorified tube buffer. (which does go to my main preamp, Bryston BP-26 which has the important task of powering the 7 meter XLR to my amp) is a Conrad Johnson ACT2.
A $13,000 list Conrad Johnson ACT 2 as a tube buffer????? yes as a tube buffer, it adds that final tiny touch of life music needs to sound wonderful. Prior to the recently acquired ACT 2, I used a $4,500 list VAC Standard I had used for over seven years nonstop. (which sadly has had a power supply failure, leading me to find the ACT 2 for sale. I could have purchased a VAC Standard SE, but I decided to move up a notch. eventually the VAC may get repaired)
I also own an Audio Research SP-15 I use just for the tubes phono section, with my Kuzma Stab/Stogi S turntable. And a Audible Illusions 3A I use for it’s phono with a Rega P5.Besides five disc changers, I like preamps. But only own five.So after reading all that.. Any questions??? (as I see head shaking slowly...)