A certain online retailer asked me for a review of Pangea power cords..


Here is my response                                                                                    
"Way back when the Pangea AC9 was introduced, I bought one. My first aftermarket powercord. I didn't think a powercord could make any difference! Put it on my Forte' 4 amp, and immediately noticed better bass response. I was hooked.Since then I have upgraded everything in my system, but I stick to Pangea power cords.Just last night, listening via Rudistor RPX-33mkII headamp and Sennheiser HD800 (bought from Audio Advisor) I was, beside listening to Deep Purple "Machine Head" checking out some new outlets. And the difference was easy to hear, via the Pangea AC14SE MKII Signature powercord. The Pangea powercrds ARE GREAT, no question. Thanks Pangea dude, for creating them, and thank you Audio Advisor, for offering them to the public. I now listen to my Magnepan 20.7s, Marantz SA-10, Conrad Johnson ACT2, Kuzma Stabi Stogi S turntable. ALL using Pangea powercords.My system is no slouch, neither are Pangea powercords.
If I were to offer one suggestion, Start a line of AC14SE, and AC9SEPangea with pure copper Rhodium plated plugs.and Cryo'ed.
Thanks in advance Pangea Dude! You are a HERO.to all of us who enjoy Pangea power cords."So.. any comments?
elizabeth
Here’s the thing about power cords and interconnects. Beyond a certain level of build and materials quality, they do not get better as you spend more and more. They just sound different. So if you’re assuming that a decent Pangea cord will get killed by say an Audioquest model that cost ten times as much-- sorry, you’ll just be hearing the differences based upon your unique setup and environment and nothing less or more than that. If you think those differences are worth it then great-- but to say the sound is better or worse is just an aesthetic judgement-- i.e., you like the change/differences.

A lot of the claims made by companies selling super expensive wire are pure hokum. You buy their cables, hook them up, and you get a "different" sound or sonic signature-- and you’re very much more likely to say that sound is "better" because you paid more. COnfirmation bias is a very real thing-- proven countless times in experiments.

If I were to create an experiment where we let a group of experienced audiophiles listen to tracks played on a very high-end analog or digital system, and then switch out the cables and repeat-- so long as the sets of cables we used ranged from very well built quality cables all the way up to insanely expensive cables-- I would bet that no one would be able to rank them from least to most costly based upon various sonic "improvements" made to the system (claims that many mfg’s make all of the time). Everyone would probably hear differences and have opinions about those differences-- but NO ONE would be able to tell a $300 cable from a $3000 cable and then rank them all based upon cost.

Often, changing cables is a give and take experience. Some elements of the sound recede while other characteristics become more dominant. You gained some AND you lost some. All that really matters is whether or not you like the change, and your opinion might change over time as you get used to the changes.

So just buy the best cables you can afford, quality materials and build matter a lot. Listen to them for a while, and if you like the change(s), keep them and enjoy them. Do not assume that by spending a LOT more you will get a "better" sound-- you’ll get a different sound-- that you may or may not like.

Try not to confuse different with better. A $500 bottle of Cabernet does not taste better than a $75 bottle-- both are probably going to be excellent-- and they will be different in character-- NOT better than or worse than. Spending beyond a certain point gets you to a level of quality where what you’re looking for are sound characteristics that you like-- nothing more. There’s a hell of a lot of snake oil out there-- and many times the claims made by some of the mfg’s are a sure sign of this. Try not to be taken in by their wild-ass unprovable claims and just enjoy the music.
The $500 bottle is better, but only to folks with exceptional tasting abilities. Same thing.
Yeah, this reminds me of an old joke. What do Budweiser beer and canoe have in common ? Both are f..... close to water.
The poster above can have the Bud. In my experience, without any exceptional tasting abilities, $500 or so French wine is vastly superior to $100. From the same region, not from the same vineyard, though. No , I don't buy such an expensive wine, those couple of bottles were gifts. 
Elizabeth, I of course was not talking about you but about someone with 13 posts and a lot of opinions.
So, the weight of an opinion is based on the number of posts?  Christ, Einstein has never posted here, so....🐍💩