What do you LIKE BEST about your current audio system?

Y’all provide a few more recommendations that are great recordings and hidden gems. Best underrated jazz album ever is Duke Pearson “THE RIGHT TOUCH” buy the RGV EDITION, if you look at who is playing on each instrument ir will blow your mind! The whole album is great. My system goes into a toe tapping frenzy while this album is being played. Came out in 67. But if I’m on an island this album is a must. TRUE AUDIOPHILES ALSO KNOW THE MUSIC NOT JUST THE EQUIPMENT THAT PLAYS IT! 

What I like most about my current system is the coherence of my speakers. I have had many great 2 and 3 ways in the past, and didn't really feel that they were incoherent, but having a horn that covers all but low bass makes me realize how important it is for music reproduction.

Right now I love my new speakers!  A pair of towers I built myself taught me what 'happens' as you move through a sound path to the music.  50 years after buying my first system I now have some basic ideas and know how about the technology and how it works.  These 4 foot tall towers have very high sensitivity 10' and 6 &1/2" drivers and bullet-horned tweeters from B & C, a highend Italian product.  I built them over and over in the last 9 months and changed out new crossover boards twice to get it all where I want it.  This also put over $1000 in each cabinet.  I could have bought some great speakers for that money...instead I got to build some great speakers for that money and get an education.  

As I shouted with the first rattler I laid into it with the Jazz-Punk of the L.A. sonic rollercoaster of QUI, "It's alive!  It's alive"   These kids really kick up the dust and made my speakers dance and sing.

Right now, I pretty much like everything but two things stand out.  First, I have never heard amps sound as good in my system as the big Class A Clayton amps and I have tried out more than a few highly-regarded competitors.  They simply sound more real to me than others I have tried. The closest competitor was the Lamm M1.2 Reference amps that I also could have lived with - but I like the Clayton's better.
Second, my recent move to large (105 lbs) monitor-type acoustic suspension (i.e., sealed box), limited low frequency (i.e., 40 Hz) speakers on stands along with two high quality subs has improved imaging and has greatly improved the mid-bass response, bass depth, and impact, even at low volumes.  
Good thread @elizabeth 

This is a nice idea for a thread, elizabeth.

At first I'm tempted to say I'm most satisfied in the way my system seems to be good at almost everything I care about - organic warmth, timbral accuracy, great soundstaging and imaging, dynamic.   As close to an all-rounder system as I probably have owned.

But if I'm going to zero in on one aspect, my mind goes to the density of the sound.  (I'm using Thiel 2.7 speakers/Conrad Johnson tube amps).

It's not simply that the imaging is precise, it's that unlike other more ghostly versions of imaging I've heard, the sonic images seem dense, palpable, THERE.  When a drummer starts off a piece, the density of the central image is like a drum set has suddenly been set up between the speakers.  Same with a sax, or vocal, or whatever.  Wherever the sound source is in the soundstage, all the energy seems aligned so it's moving real air in the room, which connects me to the music.

Not saying my system is the last word in this respect, there is always "better" to chase.  But this is a feature of it's sound that I find particularly consistent and satisfying.